A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Cystolepiota seminuda has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens6
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences9
eDNA detections293
Countries19
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Cystolepiota seminuda strain FMF-1 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene and internal transcribed spacer 2, complete sequence; and large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS9★ITS1
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type5 481 records
Wild obs. + sensor4 620
Museum / vouchered850
Cultivated / captive1
Other10
Origin
Native1
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO11 492 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy34% within 1 km
≤100 m 843≤1 km 520≤10 km 2 557>10 km 84
4 004 georeferenced · 616 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor4 620
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy72% within 1 km
≤100 m 110≤1 km 186≤10 km 103>10 km 12
411 georeferenced · 439 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence850
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 1 records without
Open the mapnot free-living1
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions30 of 62 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Helsinki, FI
107
Olocation not on record
75
Copenhagen, DK
39
LDlocation not on record
28
Kew, GB
28
Zürich, CH
27
Tartu, EE
21
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
19
WTUlocation not on record
17
San Sebastián, ES
16
WU-MYClocation not on record
14
Philadelphia, US
14
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
13
Göteborg, SE
12
Görlitz, DE
12
Karlsruhe, DE
11
Vancouver, CA
10
Salzburg, AT
10
HabitatVisionlocation not on record
9
Trondheim, NO
8
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
8
GJOlocation not on record
7
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
7
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
6
TENN-Flocation not on record
6
TUR-Alocation not on record
6
Bronx, US
5
Stockholm, SE
4
Turku, FI
4
nsnflocation not on record
4
Kuopio, FI
3
TROMlocation not on record
3
Oulu, FI
3
JA-CAGPDS-CAMlocation not on record
3
Toronto, CA
3
Kyiv, UA
2
BDBClocation not on record
2
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)location not on record
2
Uppsala, SE
2
Chicago, US
2
V. N. Karazin National Universitylocation not on record
2
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
2
CJBGlocation not on record
2
Warsaw, PL
1
Fungario QCAM de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuadorlocation not on record
1
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
1
Gijón, ES
1
IB FRC Komi SC UB RASlocation not on record
1
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
1
Durham, US
1
Cincinnati, US
1
St. Paul, US
1
Berlin, DE
1
Tilburg, NL
1
National Mushroom Centre, Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, Bhutanlocation not on record
1
BRNUlocation not on record
1
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
1
Mlocation not on record
1
MAlocation not on record
1
Joensuu, FI
1
Colorado State Universitylocation not on record
1
MeiseBGlocation not on record
1
62 institutions · 597 of 850 vouchered records shown · 252 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA293 detections
Where the DNA of Cystolepiota seminuda was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found293
Studies independent surveys6
Countries19
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 293 detections have coordinates
Open the map19 countries0
IndomalayanKalkrik edellovskog med hassel, ask, eik, gr…kalklindeskogAfrotropicPalearcticNearctic
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Measured at samplingin-field
pH5.80
Conductivity79.0 µS/cm 34.0–124
Organic carbon2.02 % 1.31–2.74
Nitrate-N18.5 mg/kg 4.00–33.0
Phosphorus18.0 mg/kg 12.0–24.0
Depth0.1 m 0–0.2
SoilKandosol
2 samples with on-site data · median with range · describes the sample, not the organism
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median13.6 °C 6.20–17.5
Seasonal swing summer↔winter22.2 °C
Max temp (day)18.0 °C 8.70–21.4
Min temp (night)8.20 °C 3.90–14.2
Precipitation79.7 mm/mo 58.3–108
Air humidity61.4 % 57.5–64.9
Moisture balance4.90 mm/mo -46.2–57.2
Vapour deficit658 Pa 351–787
Wind speed2.90 m/s 1.50–4.70
Cloud cover42.1 % 35.8–49.9
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 288 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.