Crucibulum laeve
(Huds.) Kambly · speciesAt a glance
Sources11 archives
Databases and archives Crucibulum laeve's data was compiled from.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation2 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility14 807 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI42 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics3 specimens↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
LOTUSNatural Products (Wikidata)compounds↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
Der Gemeine Tiegelteuerling (Crucibulum laeve, Syn.: C. vulgare) ist eine Pilzart aus der Familie der Champignonverwandten. Er ist der einzige Gattungsvertreter in Deutschland. Der Gemeine Tiegelteuerling wurde von der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Mykologie zum Pilz des Jahres 2014 ernannt.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
No structured trait data for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Crucibulum laeve across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Compound class profile3 classes
Documented compounds5 total
| Compound | Class | Amount | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salfredin 4 | present | LOTUS | |
| Salfredin 7 | present | LOTUS | |
| Salfredin 8 | present | LOTUS | |
| Salfredin B aldehyde | present | LOTUS | |
| Salfredin B aldehyde hemiacetal | present | LOTUS |
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Crucibulum laeve has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
The complete instruction manual Crucibulum laeve carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
Record type14 807 records
Origin
Range
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions62 of 107 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| Olocation not on record | 309 |
| Bronx, US | 131 |
| BDBClocation not on record | 96 |
| Tartu, EE | 92 |
| Chicago, US | 87 |
| Copenhagen, DK | 50 |
| Córdoba, ES | 49 |
| Denver, US | 45 |
| SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record | 45 |
| TROMlocation not on record | 43 |
| Helsinki, FI | 42 |
| ILLSlocation not on record | 39 |
| Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record | 39 |
| Karlsruhe, DE | 37 |
| Davis and Elkins Collegelocation not on record | 34 |
| Görlitz, DE | 27 |
| Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record | 27 |
| Zürich, CH | 26 |
| TENN-Flocation not on record | 25 |
| Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record | 24 |
| Canberra, AU | 23 |
| LDlocation not on record | 23 |
| JA-CAGPDS-CAMlocation not on record | 23 |
| Uppsala, SE | 22 |
| GJOlocation not on record | 20 |
| Universidade Federale do Rio Grande do Sullocation not on record | 18 |
| San Sebastián, ES | 17 |
| MAlocation not on record | 17 |
| 17 | |
| Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record | 16 |
| Kensington, AU | 16 |
| Toronto, CA | 16 |
| Kuopio, FI | 14 |
| Ann Arbor, US | 14 |
| Trondheim, NO | 14 |
| Philadelphia, US | 13 |
| Pullman, US | 11 |
| Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record | 11 |
| Champaign, US | 11 |
| Centro de Estudios Superiores del Estado de Sonoralocation not on record | 10 |
| WTUlocation not on record | 9 |
| IFR-DNFlocation not on record | 9 |
| Durham, US | 9 |
| Vancouver, CA | 8 |
| Jyväskylä, FI | 8 |
| Leicester, GB | 8 |
| DPIlocation not on record | 8 |
| Kew, GB | 7 |
| Entomological Society of Latvialocation not on record | 7 |
| Salamanca, ES | 6 |
| Osaka, JP | 6 |
| Ensenada, MX | 6 |
| Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record | 6 |
| Brisbane, AU | 6 |
| Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record | 6 |
| Bando, JP | 6 |
| Bardejov, SK | 5 |
| St. Paul, US | 5 |
| Vitoria, ES | 5 |
| Oulu, FI | 4 |
| Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record | 4 |
| Stockholm, SE | 4 |
| CA | 4 |
| Staten Island, US | 4 |
| Odawara, JP | 3 |
| Turku, FI | 3 |
| FLASlocation not on record | 3 |
| US | 3 |
| European Distributed Institute of Taxonomy (EDIT)location not on record | 3 |
| Mexico City, MX | 3 |
| Durango, MX | 3 |
| Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record | 3 |
| University of Tennessee at Chattanoogalocation not on record | 3 |
| McWane Science Centerlocation not on record | 2 |
| CJBGlocation not on record | 2 |
| nsnflocation not on record | 2 |
| TUR-Alocation not on record | 2 |
| Laramie, US | 2 |
| Parkville, AU | 2 |
| California State University, East Baylocation not on record | 2 |
| Oskarshamn, SE | 2 |
| Hobart, AU | 2 |
| Umeå Universitylocation not on record | 2 |
| Madison, US | 2 |
| Göteborg, SE | 2 |
| Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiejlocation not on record | 2 |
| Warsaw, PL | 2 |
| IPA/SPlocation not on record | 2 |
| National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record | 2 |
| Berlin, DE | 2 |
| Tampa, US | 2 |
| Winterthur, CH | 1 |
| DIEF VALONSADEROlocation not on record | 1 |
| PRClocation not on record | 1 |
| Slovenian Forestry Institutelocation not on record | 1 |
| Nagatoro-machi, Chichibu-gun, JP | 1 |
| Mérida, ES | 1 |
| Tomioka, JP | 1 |
| TFC Miclocation not on record | 1 |
| Chapel Hill, US | 1 |
| Baton Rouge, US | 1 |
| V. N. Karazin National Universitylocation not on record | 1 |
| Burlington, US | 1 |
| Asheville, US | 1 |
| Logan, US | 1 |
| Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record | 1 |
| Charles University in Praguelocation not on record | 1 |
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Where the DNA of Crucibulum laeve was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Measured at samplingin-field
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.