A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Croton sonorae has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens2
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences2
eDNA detections2
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Croton sonorae voucher WIS Leon 018 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS2★ITS2
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type344 records
Wild obs. + sensor72
Museum / vouchered272
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO888 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy87% within 1 km
≤100 m 27≤1 km 14≤10 km 6
47 georeferenced · 25 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor72
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy84% within 1 km
≤100 m 128≤1 km 9≤10 km 18>10 km 9
164 georeferenced · 108 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence272
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions28 of 37 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
San Diego, US
40
Mexico City, MX
33
ASUlocation not on record
24
Durango, MX
20
Hermosillo, MX
17
Austin, US
14
La Paz, MX
12
Riverside, US
11
Ciudad de México, MX
10
Saint Louis, US
9
Ann Arbor, US
8
Chicago, US
7
Bronx, US
6
Phoenix, US
6
CASlocation not on record
5
The University of Arizonalocation not on record
5
Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Moreloslocation not on record
5
Chapingo, MX
3
Claremont, US
3
Mexico City, MX
3
EL PASO, US
2
Philadelphia, US
2
Kew, GB
2
Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Méxicolocation not on record
2
Austin, US
2
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
2
Ensenada, MX
1
Pomona Collegelocation not on record
1
Logan, US
1
Davis, US
1
Henderson, US
1
Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Región Xalapalocation not on record
1
Puebla, MX
1
Arizona State University Biocollectionslocation not on record
1
Tlalnepantla, MX
1
Flagstaff, US
1
Madison, US
1
37 institutions · 264 of 272 vouchered records shown · 6 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Croton sonorae was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median15.7 °C 15.7–15.7
Seasonal swing summer↔winter9.60 °C
Max temp (day)22.0 °C
Min temp (night)9.00 °C
Precipitation34.7 mm/mo
Air humidity50.9 %
Moisture balance-93.3 mm/mo
Vapour deficit884 Pa
Wind speed4.10 m/s
Cloud cover25.5 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.