Cronartium ribicola is a species of rust fungus in the family Cronartiaceae that causes the disease white pine blister rust. Other names include: (French), (German), (Spanish). Cronartium ribicola is native to China, and was subsequently introduced to North America. Some European and Asian white pines (e.g. Macedonian pine, Swiss pine and blue pine) are mostly resistant to the disease, having co-evolved with the pathogen. It was accidentally introduced into North America in approximately 1900, where it is an invasive species causing serious damage to the American white pines, which have little genetic resistance. Mortality is particularly heavy in western white pine, sugar pine, limber pine and whitebark pine. Efforts are under way to select and breed the rare resistant individuals of these species; resistance breeding is concentrated at the United States Forest Service Dorena Genetic Resource Center in Oregon and the Moscow Forestry Services Laboratory in Idaho. Some limited silvicultural control of the disease is possible. If bark blisters are found on branches over 10–15 cm from the trunk, those branches may be pruned off, which will stop the spread of the disease to the rest of that tree. If the main trunk is affected then no control is possible, and the tree will die once the infection encircles the tree. Infected trees are often identified by "flagging", when all the needles on a branch turn brown and die. Infections often occur on low branches close to the ground on young trees, so pruning of white pine can also be effective in multiple ways, as it improves the quality of timber by creating more knot-free timber, and reduces the likelihood of infection from the blister rust to a small extent. Another form of control practiced in some areas is to diligently remove Ribes plants from any area near white pines, including the blackcurrant. Because the infection moves from currant plants, to pines, and back again, it cannot continue to exist without its secondary (telial) host. Although effective in theory, removal of currants is rarely successful in practice, as they readily re-grow from small pieces of root left in the soil, and the seeds are very widely spread in birds' droppings. According to the Southwest Oregon Forest Insect and Disease Service Center, white pine blister rust attacks all five-needle pines. "Damage [to plants] includes mortality, top kill, branch dieback, and predisposition to attack by other agents, including bark beetles."
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Cronartium ribicola has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens53
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections54
Countries5
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10
fungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceNCBI
The complete instruction manualCronartium ribicola carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size≈94 332 870 bp assembly estimate
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
THIS GENOME Cronartium ribicola0.09 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy76% within 1 km
≤100 m 221≤1 km 364≤10 km 155>10 km 31
771 georeferenced · 78 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor849
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy41% within 1 km
≤100 m 31≤1 km 193≤10 km 271>10 km 56
551 georeferenced · 451 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 002
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions20 of 42 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Olocation not on record
158
Görlitz, DE
149
Zürich, CH
96
Helsinki, FI
78
Karlsruhe, DE
74
Tartu, EE
66
LDlocation not on record
58
Uppsala, SE
39
Toronto, CA
35
Chicago, US
26
St. Paul, US
26
DPIlocation not on record
25
Oulu, FI
13
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
11
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
7
Kew, GB
7
Research Collection of Richard C. Hamelinlocation not on record
7
Bronx, US
5
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
4
MeiseBGlocation not on record
4
IFR-DNFlocation not on record
4
Lausanne, CH
3
TROMlocation not on record
3
GZUlocation not on record
3
Trondheim, NO
3
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiejlocation not on record
3
Auckland, NZ
2
Stockholm, SE
2
California State University, East Baylocation not on record
2
Mlocation not on record
2
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
2
Ann Arbor, US
1
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
1
Durango, MX
1
Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record
1
WU-MYClocation not on record
1
Philadelphia, US
1
GJOlocation not on record
1
Canberra, AU
1
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
1
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
1
CABI Bioscience Genetic Resource Collectionlocation not on record
1
42 institutions · 928 of 1 002 vouchered records shown · 68 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA54 detections
Where the DNA of Cronartium ribicola was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found54
Studies independent surveys2
Countries4
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 54 detections have coordinates
Open the map4 countries0
Pinus peuce stem with aecidiaForest
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Measured at samplingin-field
pH3.80 3.60–4.80
Conductivity40.0 µS/cm 20.0–63.0
Organic carbon1.78 % 0.37–2.17
Phosphorus3.00 mg/kg
Clay5.89 % 1.90–7.91
Sand92.1 % 90.1–96.1
Depth0 m 0–0.2
SoilPodosolKurosol
4 samples with on-site data · median with range · describes the sample, not the organism
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median12.4 °C -2.40–17.8
Seasonal swing summer↔winter29.6 °C
Max temp (day)17.6 °C 1.40–22.6
Min temp (night)7.50 °C -7.00–13.4
Precipitation59.0 mm/mo 35.4–110
Air humidity58.7 % 55.6–62.3
Moisture balance-10.8 mm/mo -89.6–-0.3
Vapour deficit651 Pa 355–859
Wind speed3.10 m/s 2.00–5.60
Cloud cover51.7 % 20.8–58.5
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 20 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.