Crepidotus autochthonus

J.E.Lange · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Fungi/Basidiomycota/Agaricomycetes/Agaricales/Crepidotaceae/Crepidotus

At a glance

Occurrence records552

Data sources6

Biological traits0

DNA specimens4

eDNA detections3

Sources6 archives

Databases and archives Crepidotus autochthonus's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility552 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI3 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics4 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF552 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries3 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD4 specimens

01Narrative

Het grauw oorzwammetje is een schimmel in de familie Crepidotaceae. Hij leeft saprotroof, terrestrisch, soms op hout in loofbossen op voedselrijke grond.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding4 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Crepidotus autochthonus has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens4

Marker genes1

eDNA detections3

Countries2

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★ITS

fungal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type552 records

Wild obs. + sensor433

Museum / vouchered119

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO1 332 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy40% within 1 km

≤100 m 75≤1 km 79≤10 km 229>10 km 2

385 georeferenced · 48 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor433

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy85% within 1 km

≤100 m 3≤1 km 43≤10 km 7>10 km 1

54 georeferenced · 65 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence119

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions8 of 15 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Copenhagen, DK	26
Kew, GB	18
WU-MYClocation not on record	16
San Sebastián, ES	12
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record	7
HabitatVisionlocation not on record	2
Karlsruhe, DE	2
Chicago, US	1
MUSE - Museo delle Scienze di Trentolocation not on record	1
Zürich, CH	1
Vitoria, ES	1
Kyiv, UA	1
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record	1
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record	1
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova \| Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record	1

15 institutions · 91 of 119 vouchered records shown · 28 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA3 detections

Where the DNA of Crepidotus autochthonus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found3

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 3 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median14.8 °C 14.8–14.8

Seasonal swing summer↔winter18.5 °C

Max temp (day)18.5 °C

Min temp (night)9.00 °C

Precipitation176 mm/mo

Air humidity63.0 %

Moisture balance50.0 mm/mo

Vapour deficit623 Pa

Wind speed1.80 m/s

Cloud cover36.9 %

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)