Crassula connata (Ruiz & Pav.) A.Berger, 1930 è una pianta succulenta appartenente alla famiglia delle Crassulaceae, originaria di un'ampia parte delle Americhe. Precedentemente nota come Tillaea connata (Ruiz & Pav., 1798), è stata inserita nel genere Crassula nel 1930, per opera di Alwin Berger. L'epiteto specifico connata deriva dal latino con-natus, letteralmente "nato assieme", e si riferisce ai fiori, strettamente uniti alla pianta da un brevissimo pedicello.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Crassula connata has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens10
Marker genes5
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections6
Countries3
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK1★rbcL5★rbcLa★ITS4★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualCrassula connata carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Chromosomes2n = 16 n = 8
Ploidypolyploid inferred
Chromosome-count records — grouped by value · 2n = full set, n = gamete · click a value for sources & references
2n 161×CCDB · eflora
CCDB · eflora
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy92% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 389≤1 km 152≤10 km 46>10 km 81
1 668 georeferenced · 710 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor2 378
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy71% within 1 km
≤100 m 141≤1 km 319≤10 km 165>10 km 22
647 georeferenced · 985 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 632
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions54 of 72 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
San Diego, US
353
Riverside, US
172
Claremont, US
156
Santa Barbara, US
152
ASUlocation not on record
123
CASlocation not on record
79
Davis, US
59
San Luis Obispo, US
53
DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record
46
US
42
Chicago, US
41
Phoenix, US
28
Severin-McDaniel Insect Collectionlocation not on record
23
Irvine, US
18
St. Paul, US
17
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
14
Arcata, US
14
Santa Cruz, US
13
Victoria, CA
13
Saint Louis, US
13
Bronx, US
12
Los Angeles, US
10
Catalina Island Conservancylocation not on record
7
Calabar, NG
7
Northridge, US
7
Austin, US
6
Bloomington, US
6
Flagstaff, US
6
WTUlocation not on record
5
Corvallis, US
4
Tampa, US
4
San Bernardino, US
4
EL PASO, US
4
Kew, GB
4
Mexico City, MX
4
San Jose, US
4
Provo, US
4
Ensenada, MX
4
Hermosillo, MX
3
Arizona State University Biocollectionslocation not on record
3
Wuzhou, CN
3
Vancouver, CA
3
Madison, US
3
Herbarium of South China Botanical Gardenlocation not on record
3
Fort Worth, US
3
San Angelo, US
2
Universiti Sains Malaysialocation not on record
2
LDlocation not on record
2
The University of Arizonalocation not on record
2
Boise, US
2
Xiamen, CN
2
Tempe, US
2
Logan, US
1
Pullman, US
1
Brookings, US
1
La Paz, MX
1
University of British Columbia, Herbariumlocation not on record
1
Burlington, US
1
Musee des Dinosaures d'Esperaza (Aude)location not on record
1
Durango, MX
1
Fort Bragg, US
1
Turlock, US
1
La Paz, BO
1
QCNElocation not on record
1
Quito, EC
1
WAGlocation not on record
1
Long Beach, US
1
Arequipa, PE
1
Cambridge, US
1
Philadelphia, US
1
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
1
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
1
72 institutions · 1 586 of 1 632 vouchered records shown · 46 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA6 detections
Where the DNA of Crassula connata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found6
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 6 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median16.9 °C 11.2–17.4
Seasonal swing summer↔winter5.70 °C
Max temp (day)20.0 °C 13.0–20.6
Min temp (night)14.5 °C 9.80–15.1
Precipitation2.20 mm/mo 1.40–32.1
Air humidity63.9 % 51.7–69.5
Moisture balance-122 mm/mo
Vapour deficit591 Pa 500–898
Wind speed2.50 m/s
Cloud cover55.0 % 46.7–61.4
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 4 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility4 010 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI6 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics10 specimens↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
GRIN TaxonomyUSDA-ARSdistribution & uses↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
CCDBChromosome Counts DB · Tel Aviv U.genome & karyotype↗
PloiDBPloidy Databasegenome & karyotype