Coprinellus domesticus, commonly known as the firerug inkcap, is a species of mushroom in the family Psathyrellaceae. First described as Agaricus domesticus by James Bolton in 1788, it was later known as Coprinus domesticus before it was transferred to the genus Coprinellus in 2001.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Coprinellus domesticus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens7
Marker genes2
eDNA detections270
Countries18
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS★ITS1
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type3 782 records
Wild obs. + sensor3 324
Museum / vouchered446
Other12
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO9 572 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy47% within 1 km
≤100 m 765≤1 km 421≤10 km 1 297>10 km 61
2 544 georeferenced · 780 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor3 324
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy53% within 1 km
≤100 m 41≤1 km 66≤10 km 95
202 georeferenced · 244 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence446
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions19 of 40 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Karlsruhe, DE
69
Zürich, CH
60
Copenhagen, DK
47
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
23
Kew, GB
20
Görlitz, DE
19
BDBClocation not on record
15
Göteborg, SE
15
San Sebastián, ES
10
Olocation not on record
10
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
9
Salzburg, AT
7
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
7
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
5
St. Paul, US
4
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
4
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
4
WU-MYClocation not on record
3
TROMlocation not on record
3
LDlocation not on record
3
IB FRC Komi SC UB RASlocation not on record
3
Trondheim, NO
2
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
2
CJBGlocation not on record
1
Tartu, EE
1
Ann Arbor, US
1
Gijón, ES
1
Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH)location not on record
1
WTUlocation not on record
1
PHlocation not on record
1
Museo Achille Folettolocation not on record
1
Rene Pomerleau Herbariumlocation not on record
1
Helsinki, FI
1
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
1
Vitoria, ES
1
Bardejov, SK
1
Staten Island, US
1
V. N. Karazin National Universitylocation not on record
1
Warsaw, PL
1
Tomioka, JP
1
40 institutions · 361 of 446 vouchered records shown · 85 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA270 detections
Where the DNA of Coprinellus domesticus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found270
Studies independent surveys6
Countries18
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 270 detections have coordinates
Open the map18 countries0
herbe courte, sapin, aulne, epinette, sol sa…
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
25 samples with on-site data · median with range · describes the sample, not the organism
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median13.7 °C 7.50–19.2
Seasonal swing summer↔winter17.0 °C
Max temp (day)17.5 °C 11.2–24.8
Min temp (night)9.80 °C 3.00–15.0
Precipitation60.3 mm/mo 8.00–122
Air humidity59.5 % 50.0–63.8
Moisture balance-40.3 mm/mo -158–39.0
Vapour deficit658 Pa 392–1,079
Wind speed3.20 m/s 1.30–5.50
Cloud cover24.1 % 11.8–47.5
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 260 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation5 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility3 782 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI270 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics7 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗