Compounds documented for Conandron ramondioides across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Conandron ramondioides has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens2
Marker genes3
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections2
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Conandron ramondioides isolate LF13b internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene and internal transcribed spacer 2, complete sequence; and large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK1★ITS9★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
07Deep time~27.5 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin27.5 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type855 records
Wild obs. + sensor263
Museum / vouchered588
Cultivated / captive3
Other1
Origin
Native5
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO2 340 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy35% within 1 km
≤100 m 59≤1 km 21≤10 km 9>10 km 141
230 georeferenced · 33 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor263
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy26% within 1 km
≤1 km 27≤10 km 63>10 km 14
104 georeferenced · 484 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence588
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 3 records without
Open the mapnot free-living3
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions37 of 53 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Bando, JP
71
Kochi, JP
56
Shinshu Universitylocation not on record
45
Nagatoro-machi, Chichibu-gun, JP
44
Odawara, JP
43
Nagano City, JP
35
Tomioka, JP
33
KURAlocation not on record
22
Kagoshima, JP
21
Osaka, JP
19
Taipei, TW
18
Tokushima, JP
16
Toyama, JP
16
Hangzhou, CN
11
Zhejiang Universitylocation not on record
10
Nanjing, CN
10
Sendai, JP
9
Sagamihara, JP
8
Chiba, JP
8
Fukushima Universitylocation not on record
7
Taipei, TW
7
Guangzhou, CN
6
TAIElocation not on record
5
Nagasaki University - Fisherieslocation not on record
5
FFPRIlocation not on record
5
Shanghai, CN
4
Beijing, CN
4
Awka, NG
4
Museum Of Natural And Environmental History, Shizuokalocation not on record
4
Kunming, CN
3
Central China Normal Universitylocation not on record
3
Sanda, JP
3
Taipei, TW
3
Burlington, US
3
JP
2
CASlocation not on record
2
Institute for Agricultural Bacteriology and Fermentation Biologylocation not on record
2
Edinburgh, GB
2
Yangling, CN
2
Yunnan Universitylocation not on record
2
Xian, CN
1
Shanghai, CN
1
Fujian Institute of Subtropical Botanylocation not on record
1
Xiamen, CN
1
Hokkaido University Museumlocation not on record
1
Akita Prefectural Museumlocation not on record
1
Kew, GB
1
Fort Worth, US
1
Guilin, CN
1
Otaru, JP
1
Wlocation not on record
1
Wellington, NZ
1
Nanjing, CN
1
53 institutions · 586 of 588 vouchered records shown · 1 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Conandron ramondioides was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median7.40 °C 7.40–7.40
Seasonal swing summer↔winter25.4 °C
Max temp (day)9.60 °C
Min temp (night)3.00 °C
Precipitation344 mm/mo
Air humidity64.9 %
Moisture balance263 mm/mo
Vapour deficit428 Pa
Wind speed2.90 m/s
Cloud cover44.6 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.