Collybiopsis biformis

(Peck) R.H.Petersen · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Fungi/Basidiomycota/Agaricomycetes/Agaricales/Omphalotaceae/Collybiopsis

At a glance

Occurrence records169

Data sources4

Biological traits0

DNA specimens0

eDNA detections10

Sources4 archives

Databases and archives Collybiopsis biformis's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation1 languages↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility169 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI10 eDNA detections↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page3 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF169 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 2 countries10 detections

01Narrative

Gymnopus biformis is a North American species of agaric fungus in the family Omphalotaceae. The species was originally described by Charles Horton Peck in 1903 as Marasmius biformis. The specific epithet biformis refers to the two distinct cap shapes, which Peck noted could be either campanulate (bell-shaped) or flattened. Roy Halling transferred the fungus to Gymnopus in 1997.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding10 eDNA hits

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Collybiopsis biformis has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

eDNA detections10

Countries2

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type169 records

Wild obs. + sensor157

Museum / vouchered12

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO496 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy72% within 1 km

≤100 m 48≤1 km 23≤10 km 16>10 km 11

98 georeferenced · 59 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor157

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤100 m 1

1 georeferenced · 11 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence12

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Institution	Specimens
TENN-Flocation not on record	2
ILLSlocation not on record	1
FLASlocation not on record	1
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record	1

4 institutions · 5 of 12 vouchered records shown · 7 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA10 detections

Where the DNA of Collybiopsis biformis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found10

Studies independent surveys1

Countries2

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 10 detections have coordinates

Open the map2 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median20.6 °C 12.5–20.6

Seasonal swing summer↔winter1.70 °C

Max temp (day)24.6 °C 18.4–24.6

Min temp (night)17.4 °C 8.20–17.4

Precipitation253 mm/mo 79.6–253

Air humidity71.2 % 57.3–71.2

Moisture balance125 mm/mo -38.4–125

Vapour deficit699 Pa 699–733

Wind speed1.70 m/s 1.70–5.80

Cloud cover31.5 % 31.5–36.7

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 10 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)