Clavariadelphus truncatus is a species of mushroom. The common name of the species is truncated club or club coral. It is a member of the basidiomycete fungi family Gomphaceae.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Clavariadelphus truncatus across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Clavariadelphus truncatus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens7
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections41
Countries7
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Clavariadelphus truncatus voucher HMJAU59903 small subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence; internal transcribed spacer 1, 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, and internal transcribed spacer 2, complete sequence; and large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type5 125 records
Wild obs. + sensor4 370
Museum / vouchered710
Other45
Origin
Native1
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO11 656 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy82% within 1 km
≤100 m 2 526≤1 km 706≤10 km 612>10 km 96
3 940 georeferenced · 430 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor4 370
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy59% within 1 km
≤100 m 83≤1 km 148≤10 km 136>10 km 25
392 georeferenced · 318 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence710
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions38 of 74 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Helsinki, FI
84
TENN-Flocation not on record
59
Olocation not on record
55
Oulu, FI
34
WTUlocation not on record
34
Denver, US
31
Uppsala, SE
31
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
21
Ann Arbor, US
20
Chicago, US
19
BDBClocation not on record
15
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
15
Tartu, EE
13
Toronto, CA
12
Trondheim, NO
12
Pullman, US
12
Philadelphia, US
12
GJOlocation not on record
10
Vancouver, CA
9
JA-CAGPDS-CAMlocation not on record
9
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
8
Ixtacuixtla de Mariano Matamoros, MX
8
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
8
WU-MYClocation not on record
8
Davis and Elkins Collegelocation not on record
7
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
6
Karlsruhe, DE
6
Institute of Plant and Animal Ecologylocation not on record
5
Chapel Hill, US
5
Copenhagen, DK
5
MAlocation not on record
5
Zapopan, MX
5
CJBGlocation not on record
4
Turku, FI
4
Kuopio, FI
4
Bardejov, SK
3
Zürich, CH
3
nsnflocation not on record
3
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
3
St. Paul, US
2
Göteborg, SE
2
US
2
Salamanca, ES
2
Salzburg, AT
2
Durham, US
2
Mexico City, MX
2
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)location not on record
2
CA
2
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
1
San Sebastián, ES
1
Joensuu, FI
1
ILLSlocation not on record
1
Jyväskylä, FI
1
Entomological Society of Latvialocation not on record
1
Uniwersytet Jagiellońskilocation not on record
1
Durango, MX
1
Umeå Universitylocation not on record
1
IB FRC Komi SC UB RASlocation not on record
1
Fungarium of Yugra State Universitylocation not on record
1
Vitoria, ES
1
UNINE:NEUlocation not on record
1
Rene Pomerleau Herbariumlocation not on record
1
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
1
Mexico City, MX
1
TUR-Alocation not on record
1
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Instituto de Biologialocation not on record
1
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
1
Colorado State Universitylocation not on record
1
Gijón, ES
1
LDlocation not on record
1
GZUlocation not on record
1
Santa Cruz, US
1
Cincinnati, US
1
FLASlocation not on record
1
74 institutions · 651 of 710 vouchered records shown · 58 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA41 detections
Where the DNA of Clavariadelphus truncatus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found41
Studies independent surveys2
Countries6
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 41 detections have coordinates
Open the map6 countries0
Pessiere noire
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median15.1 °C 12.2–15.1
Seasonal swing summer↔winter22.8 °C
Max temp (day)18.8 °C 15.6–19.2
Min temp (night)10.4 °C 8.60–10.5
Precipitation82.5 mm/mo 78.9–138
Air humidity59.1 % 58.5–61.0
Moisture balance-34.1 mm/mo -34.5–24.9
Vapour deficit702 Pa 583–729
Wind speed3.10 m/s 2.20–4.30
Cloud cover39.5 % 38.1–44.2
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 38 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.