Cirrospilus pictus

(Nees, 1834) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Hymenoptera/Eulophidae/Cirrospilus

At a glance

Occurrence records86

Data sources6

Biological traits0

DNA specimens15

eDNA detections58

Sources6 archives

Databases and archives Cirrospilus pictus's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility86 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI58 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics15 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF86 records

Environmental DNA3 datasets · 6 countries58 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD15 specimens

01Narrative

Cirrospilus pictus is een vliesvleugelig insect uit de familie Eulophidae. De wetenschappelijke naam is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1834 door Nees.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding15 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Cirrospilus pictus has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens15

BINs5

Marker genes2

eDNA detections58

Countries6

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P625 bp consensus5 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 88% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Where individuals differ — all 74 variable positions, in barcode order

3Tvariable

15Avariable

16Avariable

27Gvariable

33Gvariable

34Tvariable

39Avariable

42Tvariable

45Avariable

48Cvariable

51Tvariable

87Tvariable

90Tvariable

93Tvariable

123Tvariable

141Gvariable

144Avariable

150Ahighly variable

162Tvariable

177Gvariable

195Tvariable

201Avariable

213Avariable

225Avariable

231Cvariable

234Tvariable

236Gmostly conserved

237Avariable

243Gvariable

255Tvariable

258Gvariable

276Avariable

285Avariable

288Tvariable

300Cmostly conserved

303Cvariable

306Avariable

307Tvariable

329Gmostly conserved

330Avariable

333Cvariable

343Gmostly conserved

351Avariable

372Avariable

375Avariable

377Cvariable

381Tvariable

384Gvariable

387Tvariable

435Tmostly conserved

453Avariable

462Tvariable

465Avariable

468Avariable

471Amostly conserved

475Tvariable

496Cvariable

498Avariable

501Cvariable

502Cvariable

504Tvariable

507Avariable

510Avariable

516Cvariable

519Gvariable

528Avariable

546Tvariable

550Cvariable

552Tvariable

561Avariable

570Tvariable

582Tvariable

585Gvariable

600Tvariable

GGTTTATCAATAAGAATAATTATTCGGTTAGAGTTAGGAAATCCAGGCTCTTTTATTGGTAATGATCAAATTTATAATTCTATTGTTACT …

Variant network

Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.

Diversity (π)7.3%

Haplotypes3

BINs3

Most divergent pair10.9%

Other

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Cirrospilus lyncussame genus10.8%Sycoscapter trifemmensissame order11.9%Sycoscapter roxburghisame order11.9%Trichogramma cacaeciaesame order12.1%Calosota elongatasame order12.3%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P18S-5P

animal barcoderibosomal

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type86 records

Wild obs. + sensor1

Museum / vouchered85

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO156 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤100 m 1

1 georeferenced

Open the mapobservation + sensor1

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy57% within 1 km

≤100 m 7≤1 km 30≤10 km 20>10 km 8

65 georeferenced · 20 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence85

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions5 of 13 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Zürich, CH	42
MZLUlocation not on record	18
RMNHlocation not on record	5
Gothenburg, SE	4
Toronto, CA	2
South Kensington, GB	2
University of Guelph, Centre for Biodiversity Genomicslocation not on record	1
Naturalis Biodiversity Centerlocation not on record	1
Helsinki, FI	1
NHMOlocation not on record	1
Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record	1
Natural History Museum, Londonlocation not on record	1
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record	1

13 institutions · 80 of 85 vouchered records shown · 5 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA58 detections

Where the DNA of Cirrospilus pictus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found58

Studies independent surveys3

Countries6

Verifiable raw sequence linked45

Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 58 detections have coordinates

Open the map6 countries0

wine yardsfarm

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median11.2 °C 8.70–16.5

Seasonal swing summer↔winter18.3 °C

Max temp (day)15.0 °C 11.5–20.4

Min temp (night)8.00 °C 3.70–13.2

Precipitation62.5 mm/mo 40.7–90.7

Air humidity60.7 % 57.7–64.3

Moisture balance-28.3 mm/mo -60.4–26.2

Vapour deficit529 Pa 400–746

Wind speed3.20 m/s 2.40–4.20

Cloud cover45.1 % 39.5–54.7

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 53 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)