A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Cipura campanulata has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens2
Marker genes3
GenBank sequences5
eDNA detections2
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Cipura campanulata isolate RM2856 small subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence; internal transcribed spacer 1, 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, and internal transcribed spacer 2, complete sequence; and large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK2★rbcL2★ITS1
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceGoaT · NCBI
The complete instruction manualCipura campanulata carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size≈2 236 803 957 bp assembly estimate
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
THIS GENOME Cipura campanulata2.24 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelScaffold
07Deep time~24.5 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin24.5 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type574 records
Wild obs. + sensor244
Museum / vouchered330
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO1 612 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy76% within 1 km
≤100 m 90≤1 km 29≤10 km 17>10 km 20
156 georeferenced · 88 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor244
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy92% within 1 km
≤100 m 137≤1 km 5≤10 km 12>10 km 1
155 georeferenced · 175 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence330
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions29 of 37 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Saint Louis, US
78
Mérida, MX
63
Durango, MX
34
Mexico City, MX
23
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record
19
Antiguo Cuscatlán, SV
13
Austin, US
13
Ann Arbor, US
12
Tapachula, MX
12
San Francisco de Campeche, MX
10
Madison, US
7
Austin, US
7
Bronx, US
6
León, NI
4
San José, CR
3
Edinburgh, GB
2
South Kensington, GB
2
Berlin, DE
2
Culiacán, MX
2
Riverside, US
1
Guatemala City, GT
1
EL PASO, US
1
MAlocation not on record
1
Calabar, NG
1
Elocation not on record
1
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
1
San Luis Potosí, MX
1
Ciudad de México, MX
1
OTSlocation not on record
1
Chicago, US
1
Porto Alegre, BR
1
Cambridge, US
1
UnBlocation not on record
1
Sangmiung Universitylocation not on record
1
Altos de Pipe, VE
1
Toluca, MX
1
Universidade Federale do Rio Grande do Sullocation not on record
1
37 institutions · 330 of 330 vouchered records shown
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Cipura campanulata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.