Cibotium cumingii — The Life Data

Plantae/Tracheophyta/Polypodiopsida/Cyatheales/Cibotiaceae/Cibotium

At a glance

Occurrence records58

Data sources7

Biological traits1

DNA specimens1

eDNA detections1

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Cibotium cumingii's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility58 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI1 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics1 specimens↗

NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗

LOTUSNatural Products (Wikidata)compounds↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

On this page6 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Traits & measurements1 literature sources1 traits

Chemical compositionLOTUS1 compounds

Occurrence & distributionGBIF58 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 0 countries1 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD · NCBI1 specimens

01Narrative

台湾金狗毛蕨（学名：）为金毛狗科金狗毛蕨属下的一个种。

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

SourcesWCVP

Habitat & environment1

Climatewet tropical

03Chemical composition1 compounds

Compounds documented for Cibotium cumingii across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").

Compound class profile1 class

Cholestane steroids1

Documented compounds1 total

Compound	Class	Amount	Source
Cholesterol		present	LOTUS

05DNA & barcoding1 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Cibotium cumingii has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens1

Marker genes1

GenBank sequences4

eDNA detections1

Countries2

The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species

rbcLJX485691.1 ↗1 136 bp

ACGT

TTTCGAATGACCCCGCAACCCGGAGTACCGGCTGAGGAAGCTGGAGCTGCAGTAGCTGCGGAATCTTCCACAGGTACATGGACCACTGTA …

Cibotium cumingii ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds; chloroplast

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

rbcL4

plant barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type58 records

Museum / vouchered58

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO144 km²

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy33% within 1 km

≤1 km 1≤10 km 1>10 km 1

3 georeferenced · 55 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence58

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions11 of 13 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Kew, GB	25
Taipei, TW	5
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record	3
Cambridge University Herbariumlocation not on record	3
Chicago, US	3
Saint Louis, US	2
Wellington, NZ	2
Ann Arbor, US	2
Auckland, NZ	1
Taipei, TW	1
South Kensington, GB	1
US	1
Cincinnati, US	1

13 institutions · 50 of 58 vouchered records shown · 8 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA1 detections

Where the DNA of Cibotium cumingii was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found1

Studies independent surveys1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 1 detections have coordinates

Open the map0 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.