Chrysomphalina chrysophylla is a species of mushroom with a north temperate distribution. Described by Elias Magnus Fries in 1821, it was placed in the genus Chrysomphalina by Swiss mycologist Heinz Clémençon in 1982.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Chrysomphalina chrysophylla has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens8
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections81
Countries6
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10★ITS1
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 956 records
Wild obs. + sensor1 561
Museum / vouchered391
Other4
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO5 800 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy80% within 1 km
≤100 m 626≤1 km 520≤10 km 254>10 km 39
1 439 georeferenced · 122 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 561
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy64% within 1 km
≤100 m 32≤1 km 108≤10 km 70>10 km 8
218 georeferenced · 173 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence391
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions24 of 49 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Olocation not on record
74
Helsinki, FI
50
Trondheim, NO
13
LDlocation not on record
11
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
11
Vancouver, CA
9
Göteborg, SE
8
Chicago, US
8
WU-MYClocation not on record
7
GJOlocation not on record
7
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
7
WTUlocation not on record
6
Karlsruhe, DE
6
BDBClocation not on record
5
Denver, US
5
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
5
Kuopio, FI
4
Copenhagen, DK
4
Uppsala, SE
4
TENN-Flocation not on record
3
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
3
Staten Island, US
2
TUR-Alocation not on record
2
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
2
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
2
Joensuu, FI
2
Turku, FI
2
San Sebastián, ES
2
Bardejov, SK
1
Durham, US
1
Cincinnati, US
1
TROMlocation not on record
1
Stockholm, SE
1
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kewlocation not on record
1
Private Collection of Steve Nesslocation not on record
1
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
1
Görlitz, DE
1
Tartu, EE
1
Salzburg, AT
1
Fungarium of Yugra State Universitylocation not on record
1
BRNUlocation not on record
1
Kew, GB
1
Slovenian Forestry Institutelocation not on record
1
Surgut State Universitylocation not on record
1
Toronto, CA
1
IB FRC Komi SC UB RASlocation not on record
1
nsnflocation not on record
1
Santa Cruz, US
1
Tromso University Museumlocation not on record
1
49 institutions · 285 of 391 vouchered records shown · 105 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA81 detections
Where the DNA of Chrysomphalina chrysophylla was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found81
Studies independent surveys3
Countries6
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 81 detections have coordinates
Open the map6 countries0
On rotten Picea log, in old, herb rich, sout…
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
72 samples with on-site data · median with range · describes the sample, not the organism
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median14.0 °C 5.00–21.6
Seasonal swing summer↔winter12.0 °C
Max temp (day)19.2 °C 9.10–26.7
Min temp (night)9.20 °C 1.00–17.9
Precipitation76.5 mm/mo 38.9–123
Air humidity59.8 % 55.7–66.0
Moisture balance-5.80 mm/mo -101–60.7
Vapour deficit682 Pa 309–1,103
Wind speed2.80 m/s 1.70–4.40
Cloud cover21.8 % 16.9–41.0
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 79 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation2 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility1 956 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI81 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics8 specimens↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗