A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Chlorophyllum rachodes has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens5
Marker genes1
eDNA detections44
Countries5
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type364 records
Wild obs. + sensor145
Museum / vouchered219
Origin
Introduced2
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO1 016 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy44% within 1 km
≤100 m 18≤1 km 11≤10 km 26>10 km 11
66 georeferenced · 79 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor145
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy53% within 1 km
≤100 m 8≤1 km 23≤10 km 22>10 km 6
59 georeferenced · 160 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence219
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions16 of 25 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
WTUlocation not on record
14
Denver, US
13
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
10
LDlocation not on record
8
Philadelphia, US
5
Karlsruhe, DE
4
BRNUlocation not on record
4
Göteborg, SE
3
Tromso University Museumlocation not on record
3
GJOlocation not on record
3
Leicester, GB
2
Vancouver, CA
2
Staten Island, US
2
Salzburg, AT
1
TENN-Flocation not on record
1
Kew, GB
1
Brisbane, AU
1
Bardejov, SK
1
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
1
Pullman, US
1
Tartu, EE
1
Osaka, JP
1
St. Paul, US
1
Uppsala, SE
1
WU-MYClocation not on record
1
25 institutions · 85 of 219 vouchered records shown · 134 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA44 detections
Where the DNA of Chlorophyllum rachodes was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found44
Studies independent surveys6
Countries5
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 44 detections have coordinates
Open the map5 countries0
Neotropicpå veldyrket plenved maurtue
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Measured at samplingin-field
Temperature14.5 °C 9.00–17.0
pH6.15 5.20–6.70
Conductivity190 µS/cm 102–217
Organic carbon4.36 % 3.41–4.74
Nitrate-N17.5 mg/kg 5.00–59.0
Phosphorus95.0 mg/kg 38.0–225
Clay28.5 % 25.0–33.1
Sand58.3 % 55.8–63.6
Depth0 m
SoilVertosolChromosol
8 samples with on-site data · median with range · describes the sample, not the organism
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median12.7 °C 9.40–15.0
Seasonal swing summer↔winter19.7 °C
Max temp (day)16.6 °C 13.2–19.6
Min temp (night)8.60 °C 6.20–10.9
Precipitation42.5 mm/mo 35.5–86.0
Air humidity59.7 % 57.4–62.8
Moisture balance-19.9 mm/mo -67.3–2.50
Vapour deficit622 Pa 437–689
Wind speed3.90 m/s 2.50–4.00
Cloud cover40.5 % 40.0–41.8
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 43 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
