Chlorencoelia is a species of fungus in the family Hemiphacidiaceae. It was originally described in 1798 by Christian Hendrik Persoon as Peziza versiformis. The species was transferred to Chlorencoelia in 1975.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Chlorencoelia versiformis has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens3
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections4
Countries5
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type740 records
Wild obs. + sensor507
Museum / vouchered227
Other6
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO2 152 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy76% within 1 km
≤100 m 242≤1 km 69≤10 km 90>10 km 10
411 georeferenced · 96 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor507
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy62% within 1 km
≤100 m 33≤1 km 56≤10 km 43>10 km 12
144 georeferenced · 83 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence227
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions27 of 50 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Olocation not on record
45
Philadelphia, US
20
Helsinki, FI
16
Metsähallituslocation not on record
11
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
10
Uppsala, SE
9
Tartu, EE
8
Kew, GB
8
Ann Arbor, US
7
Copenhagen, DK
5
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
5
Jyväskylä, FI
5
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
4
WU-MYClocation not on record
4
Karlsruhe, DE
4
Odawara, JP
3
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
3
Kuopio, FI
3
Trondheim, NO
3
Joensuu, FI
3
FLASlocation not on record
2
Chicago, US
2
Parkville, AU
2
nsnflocation not on record
2
Oulu, FI
2
TROMlocation not on record
2
Bando, JP
2
Biodiversity Institute of Ontariolocation not on record
1
TENN-Flocation not on record
1
BDBClocation not on record
1
Osaka, JP
1
Hobart, AU
1
Centre for Biodiversity Genomicslocation not on record
1
Champaign, US
1
Toronto, CA
1
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
1
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kewlocation not on record
1
Davis and Elkins Collegelocation not on record
1
FAMCALlocation not on record
1
Bronx, US
1
Zürich, CH
1
Stockholm, SE
1
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
1
PHlocation not on record
1
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
1
Gijón, ES
1
Salzburg, AT
1
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
1
St. Paul, US
1
BioFokuslocation not on record
1
50 institutions · 213 of 227 vouchered records shown · 14 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA4 detections
Where the DNA of Chlorencoelia versiformis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found4
Studies independent surveys2
Countries3
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 4 detections have coordinates
Open the map3 countries0
Palearctic
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median5.00 °C 0.9–15.2
Seasonal swing summer↔winter19.4 °C
Max temp (day)7.10 °C 2.40–19.4
Min temp (night)1.50 °C -3.00–11.4
Precipitation117 mm/mo 91.8–173
Air humidity64.6 % 60.7–68.7
Moisture balance77.5 mm/mo -14.0–115
Vapour deficit288 Pa 238–747
Wind speed5.20 m/s 3.40–7.00
Cloud cover57.1 % 43.5–66.4
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 4 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation2 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility740 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI4 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics3 specimens↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗