Chenopodium opulifolium
Schrad. ex W.D.J.Koch & Ziz · speciesAt a glance
Occurrence records5 321
Data sources9
Biological traits49
DNA specimens23
eDNA detections9
Sources9 archives
Databases and archives Chenopodium opulifolium's data was compiled from.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility5 321 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI9 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics23 specimens↗
GRIN TaxonomyUSDA-ARSdistribution & uses↗
CCDBChromosome Counts DB · Tel Aviv U.genome & karyotype↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
PloiDBPloidy Databasegenome & karyotype
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗On this page6 sections
Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
NarrativeWikipediaarticle
Traits & measurements5 literature sources49 traits
Occurrence & distributionGBIF5 321 records
Environmental DNA1 datasets · 2 countries9 detections
DNA & barcodingBOLD23 specimens
Genome at a glanceCCDB · GoaT1.8 Gbp
01Narrative
Komosa kalinolistna – gatunek rośliny z rodziny szarłatowatych, kosmopolityczny. W Polsce występuje rzadko i ustępująco; rośnie w rozproszeniu, głównie w południowo-zachodniej części kraju.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
02Traits & measurements
SourcesGIFTLEDATRYAusTraitsWCVP
Size & morphology17
Leaf length25 mm
Leaf length max75 mm
Leaf size322 mm²
Leaf width25 mm
⚠ sources differ — AusTraits: 25 mm · GIFT: 20 mm
Leaf width max20 mm
Leaf width min20 mm
Plant height1.07 m
⚠ sources differ — GIFT: 1.07 m · LEDA: 0.6 m · TRY: 0.743 m
Plant height generative0.65 m
Plant height max3 m
Plant height min0.25 m
Seed length1.23 mm
Seed mass0.62 mg
⚠ sources differ — TRY: 0.62 mg · LEDA: 0.583 mg · GIFT: 0.615 mg
Seed mass max0.7 mg
Seed mass min0.6 mg
Seed width1.2 mm
Seed width max1.2 mm
Seed width min1.2 mm
Life cycle & reproduction11
Deciduousnessaestival
⚠ sources differ — TRY: aestival · GIFT: deciduous
Dispersal typeanimal
Flowering endAug
Flowering startJul
Life formannual
Life spanannual
⚠ sources differ — TRY: annual · AusTraits: annual short_lived_perennial · LEDA: summer annuals · GIFT: annual
Lifespan years1 years
Pollination modeabiotic
Pollination syndromewind
Raunkiær life formtherophyte
Self fertilizationabsent
Diet & foraging1
Parasiteindependent
Habitat & environment13
Aquaticterrestrial
Climatetemperate
Climberself-supporting
Elevation max3 000 m
Elevation min2 000 m
Epiphyteterrestrial
Fruit fleshinessdry
Fruit typenut
Growth formherb
Habitat GIFTcrop fields
Leaf compoundnesssimple
Leaf shaperhomboidal
Woodinessnon-woody
Physiology & chemistry5
Leaf dry-matter content (LDMC)188 mg/g
Nitrogen fixingnon_nitrogen_fixer
Photosynthetic pathwayC3
Seed longevity index0
Specific leaf area (SLA)16.25 mm²/mg
Other traits2
Diaspore typefruit with appendage
Plant support typefree-standing
05DNA & barcoding23 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Chenopodium opulifolium has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens23
Marker genes6
eDNA detections9
Countries5
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK★rbcLa★trnL-F★ITS★ITS2trnH-psbA
plant barcodefungal barcodemarker
06Genome at a glanceCCDB · GoaT
The complete instruction manual Chenopodium opulifolium carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size1 823 970 000 bp
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
THIS GENOME Chenopodium opulifolium1.82 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Chromosomes2n = 54 n = 27
Ploidy6× hexaploid · measured
Chromosome records18–542n range54median54mode52records
Chromosome-count records — grouped by value · 2n = full set, n = gamete · click a value for sources & references
2n 5440×GoaT · Kew Plant DNA C-values Database · CCDB · slov-fl · CCDB · brit-fl +11
GoaT · Kew Plant DNA C-values Database — ↗
CCDB · slov-fl — Májovský J. et al., 1978: Index of chromosome numbers of Slovakian flora (Part 6). - Acta Fac. Rerum Nat. Univ. Comen., Bot. 26: 1-42.
CCDB · brit-fl — Cole, M.J. Watsonia 5: 117-122 (1962)
CCDB · iber-fl — Contribuiao para o conhecimento citotaxonmico das spermatophyta de Portugal. X. Chenopodiaceae. Queirs, M.Bol. Soc. Brot. ser. 249: 121-142(1975).
CCDB · iber-fl — Nmeros cromossmicos para a flora portuguesa, 16-37. Queirs, M.Bol. Soc. Brot. ser. 253: 5-28(1979).
CCDB · nw-europe-fl — http://wbd.etibioinformatics.nl/bis/flora.php?selected=beschrijving&menuentry=soorten&id=1814
CCDB · fl-europaea — Cole, 1962
CCDB · mediterranean
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Buttler, K. P. 1989. Chromosomenzahlen von Gefässpflanzen aus Hessen 4. Folge. Hess. Florist. Briefe 38: 11–14.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Dobea, C. & B. Hahn. 1997. IOPB chromosome data 11. Newslett. Int. Organ. Pl. Biosyst. (Oslo) 26/27: 15–18.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Queiros, M. 1979. Numeros cromosomicos para a Flora Portuguesa 16-37. Bol. Soc. Brot., sér. 2 2, 53: 15–28.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — SCHWARZOVA, T. 1980. In Chromosome number reports LXIX. Taxon 29:728.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Dvorak, F., F. Grull, I. Ruzicka & B. Dadakova. 1979. In IOPB chromosome number ! reports LXIV. Taxon 28: 391–392.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Queiros, M. 1975. Contribuicao para o conhecimento citotaxonomico das Spermatophyta de Portugal. X. Chenopodiaceae. Bol. Soc. Brot., sér. 2 49: 121–142.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Lomonosova, M. N., S. A. Krasnikova, A. A. Krasnikov, A. L. Ebel & N. A. Rudaja. 2003. Chromosome numbers of the family members Chenopodiaceae representatives from Mongolia and Kazakhstan. Bot. Žhurn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 88(8): 113–115.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Rahiminejad. 2006. IAPT/IOPB chromosome data 1. Taxon 55(2): 444–445.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Runemark, H. 1996. Mediterranean chromosome number reports 6 (590--678). Fl. Medit. 6: 223–243.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — SCHWARZOVA, T. 1978. In Index of chromosome numbers of Slovakian flora. Part 6. Acta Fac. Rerum Nat. Univ. Comenianae, Bot. 26: 1–42.
CCDB · book-ipcn75-78 — Queiros 1975
CCDB · book-ipcn75-78 — Schwarzova 1978
CCDB · book-indian_vol1 — Mehra, P.N. & Malik, C.P. 1961b, 1963 ; Cole, M.J. 1962 ; Uotila, P. 1973, 1974 ; Dvorak, F. et at. 1979 ; Schwarzova, T.l980
CCDB · eflora
CCDB · book-fedorov — Cole 19112
CCDB · book-fedorov — Mehra P. N., Malik 1963 ta
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Queirós, M. (1975a). Contribuiçao para o conhecimento citotaxonómico das Spermatophyta de Portugal. X. Chenopodiaceae. Bol. Soc. Brot. 49: 121-142.
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Queirós, M. (1979). Números cromossómicos para a flora portuguesa, 16-37. Bol. Soc. Brot. 53: 5-28.
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Schwarzová, T. (1980). Reports [In Löve, A. (ed.), IOPB chromosome numbers reports LXIX]. Taxon 29(5): 728.
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Dobeš, C. & Hahn, B. (1997). IOPB Chromosome Data 11 (ed. C.A. Stace). Int. Organ. Pl. Biosyst. Newslett. 26-27: 15-18.
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Reza Rahiminejad, M. (2006). IAPT/IOPB Chromosome Data 1 Taxon 55(2): 443-445
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Dalgaard, V. (1986b). Chromosome numbers in flowering plants from Madeira. Willdenowia 16: 221-240.
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Dvorak, F. & Dadakova, B. (1984). Chromosome counts and chromosome morphology of some selected species. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. (Bohem.) 19: 41-70.
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Dvo?ák, F. & Dadáková, B. (1984a). Chromosome counts and chromosome morphology of some selected species. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 19: 41-70
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Dvorák, F., Grüll, F., Ruzicka, J. & Dadáková, B. (1979). Reports [In Löve, A. (ed.), IOPB chromosome numbers reports LXIV]. Taxon 28(4): 391-392.
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Runemark, H. (1996). Mediterranean chromosome number reports-6 Fl. Medit. 6: 223-243.
CCDB · iapt — IAPT/IOPB Chromosome Data 27
2n 367×GoaT · Kew Plant DNA C-values Database · CCDB · iapt · CCDB · book-indian_vol1 +3
GoaT · Kew Plant DNA C-values Database — ↗
CCDB · iapt — IAPT/IOPB Chromosome Data 1
CCDB · book-indian_vol1 — Wulff, H.D. 1936
CCDB · book-fedorov — Wulff 1936
CCDB · kew — Ohri D. (pers. comm. 2002)
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Wulff, H. D. (1936). Die polysomatie der Chenopodiaceen. Planta 26: 275-290.
2n 183×CCDB · book-indian_vol1 · CCDB · book-fedorov · CCDB · CromoCat 2015
CCDB · book-indian_vol1 — Kawatani, T. & Ohno, T. 1956; Thakur, V. & Gupta, S.R. 1969 ; Crompton, C.W. & Bassett, I.J. 1976
CCDB · book-fedorov — Kawatani, Ohno 1956
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Kawatani, T. & Ohno, T. (1956). Chromosome numbers of genus Chenopodium. II. Jap. J. Genet. 31: 15-17.
2n 322×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl · CCDB · kew
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Renard, R., J. Lambinon, M. Reekmans, P. v. Veken & M. Govaert. 1983. Nombres chromosomiques de quelques Angiospermes du Rwanda, du Burundi et du Kenya. Bull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Belg. 53: 342–371.
CCDB · kew — Ohri D. (pers. comm. 2002)
2n 271×CCDB · Cave1962
CCDB · Cave1962 — Cole 1962
n 93×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl · CCDB · book-ipcn75-78 · CCDB · CromoCat 2015
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — CROMPTON, C. W. & I. J. BASSETT. 1976. In IOPB chromosome number reports LIV. Taxon 25: 631–649.
CCDB · book-ipcn75-78 — Crompton & Bassett 1976
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Crompton, C. W. & Bassett, I. J. (1976). Reports [In Löve, A. (ed.), IOPB chromosome numbers reports LIV]. Taxon 25(5/6): 645-646.
n 273×CCDB · book-ipcn73-74 · CCDB · Cave1963 · CCDB · CromoCat 2015
CCDB · book-ipcn73-74 — UOTILA, P. 1973. Chromosome counts on Chenopodium L. from SE Europe and SW Asia. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 10: 337-340.
CCDB · Cave1963 — Mehra & Malik 1963
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Uotila, P. (1973). Chromosome counts on Chenopodium L. from SE Europe and SW Asia. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 10: 337-340.
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
hexaploid1×GoaT · Kew Plant DNA C-values Database
GoaT · Kew Plant DNA C-values Database
polyploid inferred1×PloiDB · genus-scale
PloiDB · genus-scale — chromEvol; reliability=1.000 ↗
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelChromosome
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type5 321 records
Wild obs. + sensor3 603
Museum / vouchered1 598
Other120
Origin
Native166
Introduced156
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO12 188 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy29% within 1 km
≤100 m 334≤1 km 375≤10 km 1 697>10 km 10
2 416 georeferenced · 1 187 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor3 603
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy52% within 1 km
≤100 m 73≤1 km 227≤10 km 199>10 km 73
572 georeferenced · 1 026 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 598
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions56 of 116 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| Berlin, DE | 144 |
| LDlocation not on record | 131 |
| BIO-UNIPIlocation not on record | 106 |
| MeiseBGlocation not on record | 73 |
| BFLlocation not on record | 52 |
| College of the Atlantic, Museumlocation not on record | 44 |
| PRClocation not on record | 42 |
| MAlocation not on record | 42 |
| GJOlocation not on record | 40 |
| Mlocation not on record | 37 |
| BDBClocation not on record | 33 |
| Olocation not on record | 32 |
| BRNUlocation not on record | 30 |
| València, ES | 30 |
| Zürich, CH | 29 |
| Wlocation not on record | 25 |
| ISAlocation not on record | 24 |
| Córdoba, ES | 23 |
| Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record | 23 |
| Bergen, NO | 22 |
| Görlitz, DE | 21 |
| Barcelona, ES | 20 |
| Helsinki, FI | 18 |
| CICYTEXlocation not on record | 18 |
| Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record | 17 |
| Bern, CH | 16 |
| Zürich, CH | 16 |
| Uppsala, SE | 15 |
| Philadelphia, US | 14 |
| Kew, GB | 14 |
| Oskarshamn, SE | 13 |
| BG-NMNHSlocation not on record | 13 |
| Christchurch, NZ | 12 |
| BClocation not on record | 12 |
| Saint Louis, US | 11 |
| Brussel, BE | 11 |
| Pretoria, ZA | 10 |
| Salamanca, ES | 10 |
| Durban, ZA | 9 |
| Badajoz, ES | 9 |
| Auckland, NZ | 8 |
| Provincia di Livornolocation not on record | 8 |
| Staatliches Museum fuer Naturkunde Karlsruhe (State Museum of Natural History)location not on record | 8 |
| Entomological Society of Latvialocation not on record | 8 |
| Madrid, ES | 8 |
| San Sebastián, ES | 7 |
| Turku, FI | 6 |
| SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record | 6 |
| Phyletisches Museum Jenalocation not on record | 6 |
| Rishon Le Zion, IL | 6 |
| Tilburg, NL | 6 |
| Institut und Museum fuer Geologie und Palaeontologielocation not on record | 5 |
| Moscow State Universitylocation not on record | 5 |
| EEZA-CSIClocation not on record | 5 |
| Vitoria, ES | 5 |
| Oulu, FI | 5 |
| Bourges, FR | 5 |
| Kuopio, FI | 4 |
| Paris, FR | 4 |
| Granada, ES | 4 |
| Chicago, US | 4 |
| Trondheim, NO | 4 |
| TAFORI-LSRClocation not on record | 4 |
| Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record | 3 |
| Severin-McDaniel Insect Collectionlocation not on record | 3 |
| Salzburg, AT | 3 |
| John May Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record | 3 |
| Pullman, US | 3 |
| Pamplona, ES | 2 |
| NMBU:MINAlocation not on record | 2 |
| H-Meierottlocation not on record | 2 |
| Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record | 2 |
| San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record | 2 |
| Adelaide, AU | 2 |
| Frankfurt am Main | 2 |
| Sevilla, ES | 2 |
| Wellington, NZ | 2 |
| TROMlocation not on record | 2 |
| Fulda, DE | 2 |
| WTUlocation not on record | 2 |
| KMNlocation not on record | 2 |
| Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, United States National Herbariumlocation not on record | 2 |
| Coimbra, PT | 2 |
| GZUlocation not on record | 2 |
| Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universitat Greifswaldlocation not on record | 2 |
| LfUlocation not on record | 1 |
| Brookings, US | 1 |
| Göteborg, SE | 1 |
| Regensburgische Botanische Gesellschaftlocation not on record | 1 |
| Naturhistorische Gesellschaft Nürnberg e.V.location not on record | 1 |
| BSBIlocation not on record | 1 |
| University of the Witwatersrandlocation not on record | 1 |
| Rotorua, NZ | 1 |
| Porrentruy, CH | 1 |
| Madrid, ES | 1 |
| Museo Achille Folettolocation not on record | 1 |
| Wuzhou, CN | 1 |
| McWane Science Centerlocation not on record | 1 |
| sonstHerblocation not on record | 1 |
| ULBF-AGRlocation not on record | 1 |
| JBSlocation not on record | 1 |
| Victoria, CA | 1 |
| Musée des Confluenceslocation not on record | 1 |
| Henry Brockhouse Collectionlocation not on record | 1 |
| Portland, US | 1 |
| Sion, CH | 1 |
| Zlocation not on record | 1 |
| DBF-NHMDlocation not on record | 1 |
| Chinese Academy of Forestrylocation not on record | 1 |
| Hunan Geological Museumlocation not on record | 1 |
| Uniwersytet Jagiellońskilocation not on record | 1 |
| Xiamen, CN | 1 |
| University of Hamburglocation not on record | 1 |
| Arusha, TZ | 1 |
| Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicachlocation not on record | 1 |
| Canberra, AU | 1 |
116 institutions · 1 472 of 1 598 vouchered records shown · 125 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA9 detections
Where the DNA of Chenopodium opulifolium was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found9
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 9 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
UHURU South Plotscultivated in Mrs. F's gardenroadsides
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median20.4 °C 8.80–20.4
Seasonal swing summer↔winter2.60 °C
Max temp (day)25.9 °C 12.9–25.9
Min temp (night)14.8 °C 3.80–14.8
Precipitation166 mm/mo 99.2–166
Air humidity58.6 % 58.6–64.4
Moisture balance23.1 mm/mo 23.1–27.7
Vapour deficit989 Pa 493–989
Wind speed2.70 m/s 2.00–2.70
Cloud cover49.7 % 44.7–49.7
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 3 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.