Chamaenerion dodonaei
(Vill.) Schur ex Fuss. · speciesAt a glance
Occurrence records1 999
Data sources9
Biological traits28
DNA specimens0
eDNA detections3
Sources9 archives
Databases and archives Chamaenerion dodonaei's data was compiled from.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation14 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility1 999 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI3 eDNA detections↗
LOTUSNatural Products (Wikidata)compounds↗
GRIN TaxonomyUSDA-ARSdistribution & uses↗
CCDBChromosome Counts DB · Tel Aviv U.genome & karyotype↗
PloiDBPloidy Databasegenome & karyotype
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗On this page6 sections
Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
NarrativeWikipediaarticle
Traits & measurements3 literature sources28 traits
Chemical compositionLOTUS65 compounds
Occurrence & distributionGBIF1 999 records
Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries3 detections
Genome at a glanceCCDB2n = 36
01Narrative
Das Rosmarin-Weidenröschen (Epilobium dodonaei) ist eine Pflanzenart aus der Gattung der Weidenröschen (Epilobium) innerhalb der Familie der Nachtkerzengewächse (Onagraceae).
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
02Traits & measurements
SourcesGIFTLEDATRY
Size & morphology10
Leaf mass10.37 mg
Leaf size122 mm²
Plant height0.55 m
⚠ sources differ — GIFT: 0.55 m · LEDA: 0.55 m · TRY: 0.85 m
Plant height generative0.6 m
Plant height max1 m
Plant height min0.5 m
Seed length1.84 mm
Seed mass0.263 mg
⚠ sources differ — TRY: 0.263 mg · GIFT: 0.22 mg
Seed mass max0.22 mg
Seed mass min0.22 mg
Life cycle & reproduction8
Deciduousnessevergreen
Dispersal typewind
Flowering endOct
Flowering startJun
Life spanperennial
Lifespan years3 years
Raunkiær life formchamaephyte
Seed number1 295
Diet & foraging1
Parasiteindependent
Habitat & environment5
Aquaticterrestrial
Climberself-supporting
Epiphyteterrestrial
Growth formherb
Woodinesssemi-woody
⚠ sources differ — TRY: semi-woody · LEDA: semi-woody · GIFT: non-woody
Physiology & chemistry3
Leaf dry-matter content (LDMC)294 mg/g
⚠ sources differ — TRY: 294 mg/g · LEDA: 209 mg/g
Photosynthetic pathwayC3
Specific leaf area (SLA)6.44 mm²/mg
⚠ sources differ — TRY: 6.44 mm²/mg · LEDA: 11.53 mm²/mg · GIFT: 11.53 mm²/mg
Other traits1
Diaspore typeone-seeded generative dispersule
03Chemical composition65 compounds
Compounds documented for Chamaenerion dodonaei across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Compound class profile5 classes
Unsaturated fatty acids15
Flavonols10
Cinnamic acids and derivatives9
Dihydroflavonols9
Branched fatty acids $ Unsaturated fatty acids6
Documented compounds65 total
| Compound | Class | Amount | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| (+)-Ursolic Acid | present | LOTUS | |
| (2S,3R)-2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-3-[(2S,3R,4S,5R,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxy-2,3-dihydrochromen-4-one | present | LOTUS | |
| (2S,3R)-2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-3-[(2S,3R,4S,5S)-3,4,5-trihydroxyoxan-2-yl]oxy-2,3-dihydrochromen-4-one | present | LOTUS | |
| (2S,3R)-3-[(2S,3R,4R,5R)-5-[(1R)-1,2-dihydroxyethyl]-3,4-dihydroxyoxolan-2-yl]oxy-2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-2,3-dihydrochromen-4-one | present | LOTUS | |
| (2S,3R)-5,7-dihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-3-[(2S,3R,4S,5S)-3,4,5-trihydroxyoxan-2-yl]oxy-2,3-dihydrochromen-4-one | present | LOTUS | |
| (2S,3S,4S,5R,6R)-6-[[(2S,3R)-2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-4-oxo-2,3-dihydrochromen-3-yl]oxy]-3,4,5-trihydroxyoxane-2-carboxylic acid | present | LOTUS | |
| (2S,3S,4S,5R,6R)-6-[[(2S,3R)-5,7-dihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-oxo-2,3-dihydrochromen-3-yl]oxy]-3,4,5-trihydroxyoxane-2-carboxylic acid | present | LOTUS | |
| (3S,4aR,6aR,6aR,6bR,8aR,12S,12aS,14aR,14bR)-4,4,6a,6b,8a,12,14b-heptamethyl-11-methylidene-1,2,3,4a,5,6,6a,7,8,9,10,12,12a,13,14,14a-hexadecahydropicen-3-ol | present | LOTUS | |
| 2-(3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-4-oxo-4H-1-benzopyran-3-yl 6-deoxyhexopyranoside | present | LOTUS | |
| 2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl- | present | LOTUS |
05DNA & barcoding3 eDNA hits
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Chamaenerion dodonaei has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
eDNA detections3
Countries1
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manual Chamaenerion dodonaei carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Chromosomes2n = 36 n = 18
Ploidydiploid inferred
Chromosome records18–1082n range36median36mode68records
Chromosome-count records — grouped by value · 2n = full set, n = gamete · click a value for sources & references
2n 3656×CCDB · ita-fl · CCDB · slov-fl · CCDB · iapt +15
CCDB · ita-fl — LOON J.C., JONG H. - 1978. IOPB chromosome number reports LIX.. Taxon , 27(1): 57-60.
CCDB · slov-fl — Májovský J. et al., 1970a: Index of chromosome numbers of Slovakian flora (Part 1). - Acta Fac. Rerum Nat. Univ. Comen., Bot. 16: 1-26.
CCDB · slov-fl — Májovský J. et al., 1970b: Index of chromosome numbers of Slovakian flora Part 2. - Acta Fac. Rerum Nat. Univ. Comen., Bot. 18: 45-60.
CCDB · slov-fl — Kochjarová J., 1991: Karyological study of the Slovak flora XXIII. - Acta Fac. Rerum Nat. Univ. Comen., Bot. 38 [1990]: 89-99.
CCDB · slov-fl — Májovský J. et al., 1978: Index of chromosome numbers of Slovakian flora (Part 6). - Acta Fac. Rerum Nat. Univ. Comen., Bot. 26: 1-42.
CCDB · iapt — IAPT/IOPB Chromosome Data 13
CCDB · brit-fl — Mosquin, T. Brittonia 18: 167-188 (1966)
CCDB · brit-fl — McAllister, H.A. (2001)
CCDB · brit-fl — Thakur, V. (1965)
CCDB · brit-fl — Raven, P.H., Moore, D.M. Watsonia 6: 36-38 (1964)
CCDB · brit-fl — Myerscough, P.J. J. Ecol. 68: 1047-1074 (1980)
CCDB · nw-europe-fl — http://wbd.etibioinformatics.nl/bis/flora.php?selected=beschrijving&menuentry=soorten&id=3060
CCDB · fl-europaea — Mosquin, 1967
CCDB · fl-europaea — Majovsky et al.,
CCDB · poland — Izmai?ow R. 1977. Cytological studies in Polish representatives of the genus Epilobium L. Acta Biol. Cracov. Ser. Bot. 20, 101-111.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Yurtsev, B. A. & P. G. ZHUKOVA. 1982. Chromosome numbers of some plants of the northeastern Yakutia (the drainage of the Indigirka River in its middle reaches). Bot. Zhurn. 67 (6): 778–787. (In Russian).
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Löve, A. & D. Löve. 1982. In: IOPB chromosome number reports LXXIV. Taxon 31: 120–126.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Dobea, C., B. Hahn & W. Morawetz. 1997. Chromosomenzahlen zur Gefässpflanzen-Flora Österreichs. Linzer Biol. Beitr. 29(1): 5–43.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Jav|0urková-Jarolímová, V. 1992. In J. M|3esí|3ccek & V. Jav@0urková-Jarolímová, List of Chromosome Numbers of the Czech Vascular Plants. Academia, Praha.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Lövkvist, B. & U. M. Hultgård. 1999. Chromosome numbers in south Swedish vascular plants. Opera Bot. 137: 1–42.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Chen, C., P. C. Hoch & P. H. Raven. 1992. Systematics of Epilobium (Onagraceae) in China. Syst. Bot. Monogr. 34: 1–209.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Dawe, J. C. & D. F. Murray. 1981a. In Chromosome number reports LXX. Taxon 30: 70–72.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Krogulevich, R. E. 1978. Kariologicheskij analiz vidov flory Vostochnogo Sajana. V Flora Pribajkal'ja. 19–48. Nauka, Novosibirsk.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Probatova. 2005. Chromosome numbers of some dicotyledons of the flora of the Amur Region. Bot. Žhurn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 90(5): 779–792.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Dmitrieva, S. A. & V. I. Parfenov. 1985. Kariologicheskaja kharakteristika nekotorykh vidov poleznykh rastenij flory Belorussii. Izv. Akad. Nauk Belorussk. SSR, Ser. Biol. Nauk 6: 3–8.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Magulaev, A. V. 1984. Cytotaxonomic study in some flowering plants of the North Caucasus. Bot. Zhurn. SSSR 69(4): 511–517.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Dmitrieva, S. A. 1986. Chisla khromosom nekotorych vidov rastenij Berezinskogo Biosfernogo Zapovednika. Zapov. Belorussii Issl. 10: 24–28.
CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 — JOHNSON, A.W., & J.G. PACKER. 1968. Chromosome numbers in the flora of Ogotruk Creek, N.W. Alaska. Bot. Not. 121: 403-456.
CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 — TAYLOR, R.L., & G.A. MULLIGAN. 1968. Flora of the Queen Charlotte Islands. Part 2. Cytological aspects of the Vascular Plants. Queen's Printer, Ottawa. pp. 148.
CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 — GADELLA, Th. W. J., & E. KLIPHUIS. 1967. Chromosome numbers of flowering plants in the Netherlands III. Proc. Roy. Neth. Acad. Sci. Ser. c. 70: 7-20.
CCDB · book-ipcn75-78 — Izmailow 1977
CCDB · book-northern-plants — Johansen 1929. L. & L. (unpubl.).
CCDB · book-indian_vol1 — Michaelis, P. 1925, 1926; Johansen, D.A. 1929 b; Tischler, G. 1934 ; Raven, P.H. & Moore, D.M. 1964; Gadella, T.W.J. & Kliphuis, E. 1967; Johnson, A.W. & Packer, J.G. 1968; Taylor, R.L. & Mulligan, G.A. 1968; Scholte, G. 1977; Van Loon, J. Chr. & de Jong, H. 1978
CCDB · book-indian_vol1 — Brun,J. 1958
CCDB · eflora
CCDB · book-fedorov — Michaelis P. 1925, 1926
CCDB · book-fedorov — Johansen 1929b
CCDB · book-fedorov — Tischler 1934
CCDB · book-fedorov — Raven, Moore 1964
CCDB · book-fedorov — Gadella, Kliphuis 1967
+13 more references
2n 727×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl · CCDB · book-ipcn66 · CCDB · CromoCat 2015
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Löve, A. & D. Löve. 1982. In: IOPB chromosome number reports LXXIV. Taxon 31: 120–126.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Chen, C., P. C. Hoch & P. H. Raven. 1992. Systematics of Epilobium (Onagraceae) in China. Syst. Bot. Monogr. 34: 1–209.
CCDB · book-ipcn66 — Love & Love 1966b
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Mosquin, T. (1963). Chromosomal races of Epilobium angustifolium and their taxonomic rank Amer. J. Bot. 50:636
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Castroviejo & al. (2003). Flora Iberica (vol. I-VIII, X, XIV) Publicaciones del CSIC Madrid
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Mulligan, G. A. (1957). Chromosome numbers of Canadian weeds. I. Canad. J. Bot. 35: 779-789.
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Chen, C., Hoch, P. C. & Raven, P. H. (1992). Systematics of Epilobium (Onagraceae) in China Syst. Bot. Monogr. 34: 1–209
2n 183×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl · CCDB · book-indian_vol1 · CCDB · CromoCat 2015
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Chatterjee, A., S. Ghosh & S. C. Roy. 1989. A cytological survey of eastern Himalayan plants III. Cell Chromosome Res. 12: 22–29.
CCDB · book-indian_vol1 — Jash, M. & Sharma, A. 1970
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Chatterjee, A., Ghosh, S. & Roy, S. C. (1989). A cytological survey of eastern Himalayan plants III. Cell Chromosome Res. 12: 22-29.
2n 02×CCDB · CromoCat 2015
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Jeelani, R. M., Kumari, S. & Gupta, R. C. (2011). IAPT/IOPB Chromosome Data 12 Taxon 60:1788-1789
2n 1082×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl · CCDB · CromoCat 2015
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Tanaka, R., K. Oginuma & S. Toko. 1988. Karyomorphological studies on 26 species in ten genera of the Onagraceae. Kromosomo 51–52: 1675–1696.
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Tanaka, R., K. Oginuma & S. Toko. (1988). Karyomorphological studies on 26 species in ten genera of the Onagraceae. Kromosomo 51-52: 1675-1696.
n 1812×CCDB · iapt · CCDB · ipcn-api-dl · CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 +2
CCDB · iapt — IAPT/IOPB Chromosome Data 12
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — UOTILA, P. & K. Pellinen. 1985. Chromosome numbers in vascular plants from Finland. Acta Bot. Fenn. 130.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Khatoon, S. & S. I. Ali. 1993. Chromosome Atlas of the Angiosperms of Pakistan. Department of Botany, University of Karachi, Karachi.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Dalgaard, V. 1989. Additional chromosome numbers in vascular plants from the Disko Bugt area (west Greenland). Willdenowia 19: 199–213.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Theurillat, J. P. 1979. Etude biosystématique d'Epilobium dodonaei Vill. et d'E. fleischeri Hochst. (Onagraceae). Bull. Soc. Neuchateloise Sci. Nat. 102: 105–128.
CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 — MOSQUIN, T. 1967. Evidence for autopolyploidy in Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceael. Evolution 21: 713-719.
CCDB · Cave1959 — Brun 1958
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Castroviejo & al. (2003). Flora Iberica (vol. I-VIII, X, XIV) Publicaciones del CSIC Madrid
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Chen, C.-j., Hoch, P. C. & Raven, P. H. (1988). Variation patterns and systematics of the widespread species Epilobium angustifolium L. (Onagraceae) in China Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 26: 81-95
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Khatoon, S. & Ali, S. I. (1993). Chromosome Atlas of the Angiosperms of Pakistan. Department of Botany, University of Karachi, Karachi
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Uotila, P. & K. Pellinen. (1985). Chromosome numbers in vascular plants from Finland. Acta Bot. Fenn. 130: 1-37.
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Jeelani, R. M., Kumari, S. & Gupta, R. C. (2011). IAPT/IOPB Chromosome Data 12 Taxon 60:1788-1789
n 364×CCDB · book-ipcn66 · CCDB · CromoCat 2015
CCDB · book-ipcn66 — Mosquin 1966
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Castroviejo & al. (2003). Flora Iberica (vol. I-VIII, X, XIV) Publicaciones del CSIC Madrid
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Chen, C.-j., Hoch, P. C. & Raven, P. H. (1988). Variation patterns and systematics of the widespread species Epilobium angustifolium L. (Onagraceae) in China Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 26: 81-95
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Jeelani, R. M., Kumari, S. & Gupta, R. C. (2011). IAPT/IOPB Chromosome Data 12 Taxon 60:1788-1789
n 02×CCDB · CromoCat 2015
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Khatoon, S. (1991). Polyploidy in flora of Pakistan – An analytical study. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Botany, University of Karachi. Karachi, Pakistan.
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Mosquin, T. (1963). Chromosomal races of Epilobium angustifolium and their taxonomic rank Amer. J. Bot. 50:636
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
diploid inferred1×PloiDB · genus-scale
PloiDB · genus-scale — chromEvol; reliability=1.000 ↗
07Deep time~15.7 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin15.7 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 999 records
Wild obs. + sensor1 632
Museum / vouchered314
Other53
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO5 600 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy90% within 1 km
≤100 m 824≤1 km 127≤10 km 71>10 km 32
1 054 georeferenced · 578 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 632
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy32% within 1 km
≤1 km 13≤10 km 26>10 km 2
41 georeferenced · 273 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence314
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions1 of 7 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| BIO-UNIPIlocation not on record | 239 |
| Moscow State Universitylocation not on record | 69 |
| Saint Louis, US | 2 |
| Sede dell'Orto botanico del Museo di Storia naturale dell'Università degli Studi di Parmalocation not on record | 1 |
| Institut und Museum fuer Geologie und Palaeontologielocation not on record | 1 |
| GBS RAN - Glavny Botanichesky Sad Rossijskoj Akademii Nauklocation not on record | 1 |
| PRClocation not on record | 1 |
7 institutions · 314 of 314 vouchered records shown
09Environmental DNA3 detections
Where the DNA of Chamaenerion dodonaei was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found3
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 3 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median18.1 °C 18.1–18.1
Seasonal swing summer↔winter21.4 °C
Max temp (day)22.4 °C
Min temp (night)12.9 °C
Precipitation75.2 mm/mo
Air humidity56.8 %
Moisture balance-53.5 mm/mo
Vapour deficit897 Pa
Wind speed3.10 m/s
Cloud cover31.8 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.