A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Chaenotheca brunneola has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens2
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences7
eDNA detections2
Countries4
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Chaenotheca brunneola voucher CCDB-33187-G08 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene and internal transcribed spacer 2, complete sequence; and large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS7
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type5 268 records
Wild obs. + sensor3 020
Museum / vouchered2 231
Other17
Origin
Native3
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO13 324 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy75% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 520≤1 km 648≤10 km 706>10 km 13
2 887 georeferenced · 133 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor3 020
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy63% within 1 km
≤100 m 248≤1 km 346≤10 km 277>10 km 66
937 georeferenced · 1 294 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence2 231
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions39 of 90 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
WTUlocation not on record
264
Uppsala, SE
259
Olocation not on record
118
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
92
St. Paul, US
87
Vancouver, CA
84
Auckland, NZ
84
Trondheim, NO
80
Philadelphia, US
77
Bronx, US
75
CLUlocation not on record
68
Canberra, AU
56
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
56
Madison, US
52
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
51
GZUlocation not on record
48
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
40
LDlocation not on record
36
Bergen, NO
35
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
33
University of Gdansklocation not on record
31
Berlin, DE
29
MeiseBGlocation not on record
27
Université Lavallocation not on record
24
Durham, US
21
ASUlocation not on record
18
Stockholm, SE
18
Chicago, US
16
DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record
16
Hobart, AU
13
Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden-Institutelocation not on record
13
Göteborg, SE
13
PHlocation not on record
12
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
12
Ann Arbor, US
11
Helsinki, FI
11
BioFokuslocation not on record
11
CJBGlocation not on record
9
US
9
NMBU:MINAlocation not on record
8
FLASlocation not on record
8
Umeå Universitylocation not on record
7
ILLSlocation not on record
7
TROMlocation not on record
7
València, ES
7
Karlsruhe, DE
6
Museum of the Rockieslocation not on record
5
TSBlocation not on record
5
BClocation not on record
5
San Sebastián, ES
4
Wuzhou, CN
4
UoB-IBlocation not on record
4
Salzburg, AT
3
Vitoria, ES
3
ULBF-AGRlocation not on record
3
Toronto, CA
3
MAlocation not on record
3
Boise, US
3
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (UNAL)location not on record
3
Museo Achille Folettolocation not on record
3
nbflocation not on record
3
Oregon State Universitylocation not on record
2
Mount Annan, AU
2
Staatsarchiv Urilocation not on record
2
Kensington, AU
2
NYSlocation not on record
2
Weber State Universitylocation not on record
2
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
2
Wellington, NZ
2
Clocation not on record
2
Fort Hayslocation not on record
2
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
2
South Kensington, GB
2
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburghlocation not on record
1
Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record
1
IPA/SPlocation not on record
1
CASlocation not on record
1
Kew, GB
1
M-Lichenslocation not on record
1
Institute of the Industrial Ecology Problems of the North of Kola Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences.location not on record
1
Edmonton, CA
1
US
1
PRClocation not on record
1
New Haven, US
1
MNHWlocation not on record
1
Chapel Hill, US
1
AUAlocation not on record
1
Auckland, NZ
1
Madrid, ES
1
Brisbane, AU
1
90 institutions · 2 154 of 2 231 vouchered records shown · 76 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Chaenotheca brunneola was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
on rotten pine lignum of standiing snag
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median7.60 °C 4.30–10.8
Seasonal swing summer↔winter16.6 °C
Max temp (day)10.1 °C 7.50–12.8
Min temp (night)3.90 °C 0.7–7.10
Precipitation109 mm/mo 71.1–146
Air humidity68.1 % 64.4–71.8
Moisture balance41.6 mm/mo 22.5–60.7
Vapour deficit364 Pa 353–374
Wind speed3.90 m/s 2.70–5.10
Cloud cover54.9 % 52.1–57.7
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.