Chaenotheca brachypoda is a species of lichen in the family Coniocybaceae. It was first described in 1816 by Erik Acharius as Coniocybe brachypoda. Leif Tibell transferred it to the genus Chaenotheca in 1987.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Chaenotheca brachypoda has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens2
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences4
eDNA detections2
Countries3
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Chaenotheca brachypoda voucher PRA-Vondrak25164 small subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence; internal transcribed spacer 1, 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, and internal transcribed spacer 2, complete sequence; and large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS4
fungal barcode
07Deep time~31.5 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin31.5 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type10 819 records
Wild obs. + sensor9 834
Museum / vouchered981
Other4
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO22 032 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy88% within 1 km
≤100 m 6 933≤1 km 1 091≤10 km 1 130>10 km 2
9 156 georeferenced · 678 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor9 834
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy82% within 1 km
≤100 m 285≤1 km 124≤10 km 88>10 km 4
501 georeferenced · 480 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence981
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions22 of 50 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Olocation not on record
200
Uppsala, SE
114
Trondheim, NO
90
Philadelphia, US
89
WTUlocation not on record
61
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
54
LDlocation not on record
40
Vancouver, CA
33
University of Gdansklocation not on record
32
CLUlocation not on record
21
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
19
MeiseBGlocation not on record
16
Madison, US
15
Helsinki, FI
12
Durham, US
12
BioFokuslocation not on record
11
GZUlocation not on record
9
Göteborg, SE
9
Bergen, NO
8
CJBGlocation not on record
6
Stockholm, SE
6
ASUlocation not on record
5
Berlin, DE
5
Metsähallituslocation not on record
5
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
5
BClocation not on record
4
Museo Achille Folettolocation not on record
4
Oulu, FI
4
Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record
4
Université Lavallocation not on record
3
NMBU:MINAlocation not on record
2
PHlocation not on record
2
Kuopio, FI
2
Edinburgh, GB
2
San Sebastián, ES
2
Institute of the Industrial Ecology Problems of the North of Kola Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences.location not on record
2
PRClocation not on record
2
Arcata, US
2
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
2
Chicago, US
2
St. Paul, US
2
TSBlocation not on record
1
Bronx, US
1
CASlocation not on record
1
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
1
South Kensington, GB
1
Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden-Institutelocation not on record
1
Tilburg, NL
1
Kew, GB
1
AUAlocation not on record
1
50 institutions · 927 of 981 vouchered records shown · 52 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Chaenotheca brachypoda was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median3.50 °C 3.50–3.50
Seasonal swing summer↔winter23.1 °C
Max temp (day)6.80 °C
Min temp (night)-0.1 °C
Precipitation61.7 mm/mo
Air humidity63.5 %
Moisture balance17.8 mm/mo
Vapour deficit351 Pa
Wind speed2.40 m/s
Cloud cover51.4 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.