Ceanothus caeruleus is a species of Ceanothus shrub first described by Mariano Lagasca y Segura. Ceanothus caeruleus is part of the genus Ceanothus and the family Rhamnaceae.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ceanothus caeruleus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens1
Marker genes3
GenBank sequences4
eDNA detections1
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK1★ITS3★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
07Deep time~5.06 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin5.06 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type2 404 records
Wild obs. + sensor399
Museum / vouchered1 999
Other6
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO5 096 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy87% within 1 km
≤100 m 146≤1 km 58≤10 km 19>10 km 11
234 georeferenced · 165 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor399
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy96% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 132≤1 km 25≤10 km 51>10 km 2
1 210 georeferenced · 789 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 999
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions53 of 80 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Durango, MX
489
Austin, US
248
Mexico City, MX
177
Saint Louis, US
133
Mexico City, MX
86
Chapingo, MX
61
Ann Arbor, US
61
Mexico City, MX
59
Chicago, US
53
Austin, US
50
Guasave, MX
48
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
46
Bronx, US
40
MEXUlocation not on record
39
San Francisco, US
30
Giardini Botanici Hanburylocation not on record
30
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record
22
California Academy of Scienceslocation not on record
21
Juriquilla, MX
21
Tapachula, MX
19
Cambridge, US
16
Ciudad de México, MX
15
Tuxtla Gutiérrez, MX
14
South Kensington, GB
13
Montecillo, Texcoco, MX
12
Museo Nacional de Costa Rica (MNCR)location not on record
12
Madison, US
11
Anchorage, US
10
Cambridge, US
9
Autlán de Navarro, MX
9
Kew, GB
8
Paris, FR
7
Tampa, US
6
Puebla, MX
6
Zapopan, MX
5
Davis, US
5
Mérida, MX
5
Sociedad para el Estudio de los Recursos Bióticos de Oaxaca, A. C.location not on record
5
Instituto de Ecología Aplicada, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipaslocation not on record
4
Guatemala City, GT
4
Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Región Xalapalocation not on record
3
The University of Arizonalocation not on record
3
MAlocation not on record
3
Chicago, US
3
San Diego, US
3
La Paz, MX
3
Durham, US
2
Los Angeles, US
2
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
2
Zacatecas, MX
2
Hermosillo, MX
2
CASlocation not on record
2
San José, CR
2
Bern, CH
2
NO DISPONIBLElocation not on record
2
Mexico City, MX
2
University of Zhejianglocation not on record
2
Phoenix, US
2
Riverside, US
2
BMlocation not on record
2
Linares, MX
1
Morelia, MX
1
Museo de Historia Natural Alfredo Dugés, Universidad de Guanajuatolocation not on record
1
Centro Cultural Santo Domingolocation not on record
1
Wuzhou, CN
1
Chapel Hill, US
1
Universität Göttingenlocation not on record
1
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografíalocation not on record
1
Ciudad de México, MX
1
Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Méxicolocation not on record
1
Bloomington, US
1
Muséum Henri Lecoqlocation not on record
1
DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record
1
Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Moreloslocation not on record
1
Universidad de Autonoma de Baja Californialocation not on record
1
San Luis Potosí, MX
1
Toluca, MX
1
Museum of the Rockieslocation not on record
1
MeiseBGlocation not on record
1
Tuxtla Gutiérrez, MX
1
80 institutions · 1 975 of 1 999 vouchered records shown · 23 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA1 detections
Where the DNA of Ceanothus caeruleus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found1
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 1 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median15.7 °C 15.7–15.7
Seasonal swing summer↔winter9.60 °C
Max temp (day)22.0 °C
Min temp (night)9.00 °C
Precipitation34.7 mm/mo
Air humidity50.9 %
Moisture balance-93.3 mm/mo
Vapour deficit884 Pa
Wind speed4.10 m/s
Cloud cover25.5 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.