Carex sterilis adalah spesies tumbuhan seperti rumput yang tergolong ke dalam famili Cyperaceae. Spesies ini juga merupakan bagian dari ordo Poales. Spesies Carex sterilis sendiri merupakan bagian dari genus Carex. Nama ilmiah dari spesies ini pertama kali diterbitkan oleh Willd..
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Carex sterilis has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens8
Marker genes5
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections6
Countries2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK1★rbcL4★rbcLa★ITS5★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 130 records
Wild obs. + sensor496
Museum / vouchered634
Origin
Native2
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO2 380 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy49% within 1 km
≤100 m 72≤1 km 10≤10 km 4>10 km 80
166 georeferenced · 330 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor496
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy59% within 1 km
≤100 m 37≤1 km 131≤10 km 100>10 km 16
284 georeferenced · 350 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence634
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions37 of 55 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Madison, US
115
Ann Arbor, US
84
Bronx, US
71
Bloomington, US
37
Montréal, CA
35
Toronto, CA
34
Oregon State Universitylocation not on record
32
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
28
Saint Louis, US
22
Chicago, US
17
Whitewater, US
10
New Haven, US
10
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
9
Université Lavallocation not on record
8
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
8
Tampa, US
8
Burlington, US
7
Philadelphia, US
6
Museum of the Rockieslocation not on record
6
Mount Pleasant, US
6
Oswego, US
5
WINlocation not on record
4
Montréal, CA
4
Saint John, CA
4
University of Wisconsinlocation not on record
4
Québec, CA
3
International Salmonella Centre (W.H.O.)location not on record
3
Green Bay, US
3
University of Toronto Mississaugalocation not on record
2
Dekalb, US
2
Christchurch, NZ
2
DOI/NPS, Greenbelt Parklocation not on record
2
Bangkok, TH
2
Jackson, US
2
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
2
Wuzhou, CN
2
Whitehorse, CA
2
Flagstaff, US
2
Mississippi State, US
2
Vancouver, CA
1
Knoxville, US
1
University of Manitobalocation not on record
1
Provo, US
1
Auckland, NZ
1
LINUlocation not on record
1
Chicago, US
1
Chicago, US
1
University of New Hampshirelocation not on record
1
Davenport, US
1
Dover, US
1
University of Western Ontariolocation not on record
1
Durham, US
1
North Carolina Museum of Natural Scienceslocation not on record
1
Delaware State University, Claude E. Phillips Herbariumlocation not on record
1
San Angelo, US
1
55 institutions · 621 of 634 vouchered records shown · 13 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA6 detections
Where the DNA of Carex sterilis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found6
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 6 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median20.3 °C 19.3–21.3
Seasonal swing summer↔winter30.8 °C
Max temp (day)25.4 °C 24.6–26.2
Min temp (night)15.7 °C 15.2–16.2
Precipitation96.9 mm/mo 84.2–110
Air humidity57.3 % 57.1–57.5
Moisture balance-56.8 mm/mo -57.1–-56.5
Vapour deficit1,020 Pa 951–1,088
Wind speed3.00 m/s 2.30–3.60
Cloud cover38.0 % 35.1–41.0
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility1 130 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI6 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics8 specimens↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
GRIN TaxonomyUSDA-ARSdistribution & uses↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
WikidataWikimedia Foundationstructured facts↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗