A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Carex simulata has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens14
Marker genes7
GenBank sequences8
eDNA detections9
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK★rbcL3★rbcLa★trnL-F★ITS5★ITS2trnH-psbA
plant barcodefungal barcodemarker
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualCarex simulata carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Chromosomes2n = 64 n = 32
Chromosome-count records — grouped by value · 2n = full set, n = gamete · click a value for sources & references
2n 641×CCDB · iapt
CCDB · iapt — IAPT/IOPB Chromosome Data 28
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type843 records
Wild obs. + sensor25
Museum / vouchered818
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO2 136 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy86% within 1 km
≤100 m 15≤1 km 4≤10 km 2>10 km 1
22 georeferenced · 3 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor25
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy71% within 1 km
≤100 m 81≤1 km 193≤10 km 96>10 km 15
385 georeferenced · 433 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence818
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions48 of 73 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record
57
Corvallis, US
56
Moscow, US
39
Flagstaff, US
39
Denver, US
39
DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record
32
Davis, US
30
Missoula, US
30
Claremont, US
30
Bronx, US
26
Albuquerque, US
26
Chicago, US
25
Logan, US
24
WTUlocation not on record
21
Caldwell, US
20
Pullman, US
19
Musee des Dinosaures d'Esperaza (Aude)location not on record
17
Arcata, US
17
Bend, US
15
University of Alberta Museumslocation not on record
14
Riverside, US
13
Provo, US
11
Boise, US
10
Phoenix, US
10
Bozeman, US
10
Victoria, CA
9
ASUlocation not on record
8
Pocatello, US
8
Henderson, US
8
CASlocation not on record
7
Museum of the Rockieslocation not on record
7
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
7
Ann Arbor, US
7
VALElocation not on record
7
Vancouver, CA
6
Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratorylocation not on record
5
Chadron, US
4
San Angelo, US
4
Angwin, US
3
Madison, US
3
Portland, US
3
Christchurch, NZ
3
Durango, US
3
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
3
Lincoln, US
3
Wuzhou, CN
3
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
3
San Diego, US
2
Columbia, US
2
US
2
Truckee, US
2
San Luis Obispo, US
2
Dover, US
2
Yellowstone National Park Herbariumlocation not on record
2
Delaware State University, Claude E. Phillips Herbariumlocation not on record
2
Montréal, CA
2
Pittsburg, US
2
Weber State Universitylocation not on record
1
University of Toronto Mississaugalocation not on record
1
Fredericton Stock Culture Collectionlocation not on record
1
Jena Microbial Resource Collectionlocation not on record
1
INFlocation not on record
1
Orem, US
1
Saint Louis, US
1
GAlocation not on record
1
EL PASO, US
1
University of Southern Mississippilocation not on record
1
STNFlocation not on record
1
Bloomington, US
1
MeiseBGlocation not on record
1
US
1
SEINetlocation not on record
1
Santa Cruz, US
1
73 institutions · 780 of 818 vouchered records shown · 38 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA9 detections
Where the DNA of Carex simulata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found9
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 9 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
Slightly undulating, sloping area with dry u…Less thermally influenced in this location. …
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median14.4 °C 13.8–20.7
Seasonal swing summer↔winter24.5 °C
Max temp (day)21.6 °C 21.0–27.9
Min temp (night)7.00 °C 6.70–12.8
Precipitation57.7 mm/mo 20.5–61.3
Air humidity45.9 % 44.7–49.4
Moisture balance-89.5 mm/mo -147–-83.6
Vapour deficit864 Pa 830–1,378
Wind speed2.40 m/s 1.00–3.00
Cloud cover21.7 % 14.3–25.0
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 4 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.