Carex leptonervia
(Fernald) Fernald · speciesAt a glance
Sources9 archives
Databases and archives Carex leptonervia's data was compiled from.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility2 239 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI16 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics23 specimens↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
GRIN TaxonomyUSDA-ARSdistribution & uses↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
CCDBChromosome Counts DB · Tel Aviv U.genome & karyotype↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
Carex leptonervia adalah spesies tumbuhan seperti rumput yang tergolong ke dalam famili Cyperaceae. Spesies ini juga merupakan bagian dari ordo Poales. Spesies Carex leptonervia sendiri merupakan bagian dari genus Carex. Nama ilmiah dari spesies ini pertama kali diterbitkan oleh (Fernald) Fernald.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Size & morphology2
Life cycle & reproduction25
Diet & foraging1
Habitat & environment25
Physiology & chemistry22
Uses & economy14
Other traits7
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Carex leptonervia has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
The complete instruction manual Carex leptonervia carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
2n 382×CCDB · cyper-only · CCDB · book-ipcn66
2n 361×CCDB · cyper-only
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
Record type2 239 records
Range
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions61 of 94 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| Madison, US | 285 |
| Québec, CA | 201 |
| St. Paul, US | 138 |
| Ann Arbor, US | 128 |
| Chongqing Museumlocation not on record | 117 |
| Université Lavallocation not on record | 112 |
| Toronto, CA | 88 |
| Bronx, US | 77 |
| Philadelphia, US | 77 |
| Acadia Universitylocation not on record | 59 |
| Montréal, CA | 54 |
| University of New Hampshirelocation not on record | 49 |
| Green Bay, US | 40 |
| Saint John, CA | 39 |
| University of Toronto Mississaugalocation not on record | 39 |
| Jackson, US | 39 |
| Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record | 38 |
| University of Wisconsinlocation not on record | 35 |
| Burlington, US | 35 |
| Chicago, US | 15 |
| Royal Botanical Gardenslocation not on record | 14 |
| Oregon State Universitylocation not on record | 12 |
| Durham, US | 12 |
| New Haven, US | 12 |
| McWane Science Centerlocation not on record | 11 |
| Tampa, US | 11 |
| Bloomington, US | 10 |
| Museum of the Rockieslocation not on record | 10 |
| Johnson City, US | 8 |
| Montréal, CA | 7 |
| San Angelo, US | 7 |
| Philadelphia, US | 7 |
| Dover, US | 7 |
| Morgantown, US | 7 |
| Maryland Department of Natural Resourceslocation not on record | 6 |
| Saint Louis, US | 6 |
| DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record | 6 |
| University of Stellenboschlocation not on record | 5 |
| Chapel Hill, US | 4 |
| Meguro Parasitological Museumlocation not on record | 4 |
| WINlocation not on record | 4 |
| University of Guelph, OAC Herbariumlocation not on record | 4 |
| Ypsilanti, US | 4 |
| DULlocation not on record | 4 |
| Paris, FR | 4 |
| College Park, US | 3 |
| University of Western Ontariolocation not on record | 3 |
| Bangkok, TH | 3 |
| Williamsburg, US | 3 |
| Elikins, US | 3 |
| Museo Nacional de Costa Rica (MNCR)location not on record | 3 |
| San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record | 2 |
| Durham, US | 2 |
| Christchurch, NZ | 2 |
| Moscow State Universitylocation not on record | 2 |
| Moscow, US | 2 |
| Auckland, NZ | 2 |
| McGill University, Herbariumlocation not on record | 2 |
| Phoenix, US | 2 |
| US | 2 |
| Delaware State University, Claude E. Phillips Herbariumlocation not on record | 2 |
| Tempe, US | 2 |
| Dekalb, US | 2 |
| Richmond, US | 2 |
| Little Rock, US | 1 |
| Norfolk, US | 1 |
| GB | 1 |
| Keene State Universitylocation not on record | 1 |
| Porto Alegre, BR | 1 |
| Henderson, US | 1 |
| Pullman, US | 1 |
| Taipei, TW | 1 |
| Fairfax, US | 1 |
| Whitewater, US | 1 |
| University of Wisconsinlocation not on record | 1 |
| Hamilton, US | 1 |
| Millersville, US | 1 |
| Oswego, US | 1 |
| Knoxville, US | 1 |
| Vancouver, CA | 1 |
| Wuzhou, CN | 1 |
| Chicago, US | 1 |
| Trois-Rivières, CA | 1 |
| Hudson, US | 1 |
| DOI/NPS, Greenbelt Parklocation not on record | 1 |
| Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record | 1 |
| BAYLUlocation not on record | 1 |
| GAlocation not on record | 1 |
| Black Rock Forest Consortiumlocation not on record | 1 |
| Columbia, US | 1 |
| University of Southern Mississippilocation not on record | 1 |
| Flagstaff, US | 1 |
| Denver, US | 1 |
| North Carolina Museum of Natural Scienceslocation not on record | 1 |
Where the DNA of Carex leptonervia was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.