Candelaria concolor, commonly known as the candleflame lichen or the lemon lichen, is an ascomycete of the genus Candelaria. It is a small foliose lichen dispersed globally.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Candelaria concolor across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Candelaria concolor has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens6
Marker genes1
eDNA detections6
Countries5
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type23 784 records
Wild obs. + sensor20 969
Museum / vouchered2 739
Other76
Origin
Native117
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO27 816 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy28% within 1 km
≤100 m 3 993≤1 km 753≤10 km 12 163>10 km 180
17 089 georeferenced · 3 880 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor20 969
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy36% within 1 km
≤100 m 97≤1 km 237≤10 km 489>10 km 101
924 georeferenced · 1 815 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence2 739
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions45 of 81 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Wuzhou, CN
482
Madison, US
362
Uppsala, SE
184
ILLSlocation not on record
176
LDlocation not on record
157
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
155
BDBClocation not on record
129
US
109
DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record
91
Museum of the Rockieslocation not on record
77
Durham, US
70
BClocation not on record
66
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
64
University of Gdansklocation not on record
52
Berlin, DE
46
PHlocation not on record
35
UFMSlocation not on record
35
Frauenfeld, CH
25
Ann Arbor, US
24
Minia, EG
22
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
19
Barcelona, ES
18
Vancouver, CA
17
Champaign, US
13
AUAlocation not on record
12
Edmonton, CA
12
FLASlocation not on record
11
Knoxville, US
11
Bozeman, US
10
EL PASO, US
10
Chinese Academy of Scienceslocation not on record
10
Helsinki, FI
10
Clarksville, US
10
San Luis Obispo, US
9
Göteborg, SE
9
Lincoln, US
8
Fort Hayslocation not on record
8
San Diego, US
8
South Kensington, GB
7
Burlington, US
7
Toronto, CA
6
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
6
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
6
Santa Barbara, US
5
Weber State Universitylocation not on record
5
DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record
5
Oregon State Universitylocation not on record
5
Christchurch, NZ
5
San Sebastián, ES
4
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
4
Vitoria, ES
4
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
3
University of Guelph, OAC Herbariumlocation not on record
2
Sede di Via Giorgio La Pira del Museo di Storia naturale di Firenze | Via Giorgio La Pira headquarter of the Natural History Museum in Florencelocation not on record
2
BG-NMNHSlocation not on record
2
New Brunswick, US
2
Museo Achille Folettolocation not on record
2
M-Lichenslocation not on record
2
Odawara, JP
2
Pocatello, US
2
UNESP-FCAlocation not on record
2
US
2
Tilburg, NL
2
Repubblica di San Marinolocation not on record
2
College Park, US
2
Kew, GB
1
Kathmandu, NP
1
University of Bergen, Zoological Museumlocation not on record
1
Miami, US
1
Philadelphia, US
1
NYSlocation not on record
1
València, ES
1
Barcelona, ES
1
Henderson, US
1
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (PUJ)location not on record
1
Slovak National Museumlocation not on record
1
Arcata, US
1
Oskarshamn, SE
1
Severin-McDaniel Insect Collectionlocation not on record
1
Lake Charles, US
1
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kewlocation not on record
1
81 institutions · 2 680 of 2 739 vouchered records shown · 58 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA6 detections
Where the DNA of Candelaria concolor was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found6
Studies independent surveys1
Countries4
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 6 detections have coordinates
Open the map4 countries0
Corticolous on Tilia X europaea along street…
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median14.0 °C 7.50–18.4
Seasonal swing summer↔winter11.6 °C
Max temp (day)17.9 °C 8.90–23.9
Min temp (night)9.40 °C 5.10–13.8
Precipitation77.9 mm/mo 46.6–97.2
Air humidity61.3 % 53.4–64.8
Moisture balance-41.4 mm/mo -80.6–37.0
Vapour deficit703 Pa 375–917
Wind speed3.70 m/s 2.90–5.30
Cloud cover44.3 % 30.1–52.3
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 4 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.