Calosoma cancellatum

Eschscholtz, 1833 · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Coleoptera/Carabidae/Calosoma

At a glance

Occurrence records132

Data sources5

Biological traits0

DNA specimens7

eDNA detections1

Sources5 archives

Databases and archives Calosoma cancellatum's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation1 languages↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility132 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI1 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics7 specimens↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF132 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 0 countries1 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD7 specimens

01Narrative

Calosoma cancellatum is a species of ground beetle in the subfamily of Carabinae. It was described by Eschscholtz in 1833.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding7 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Calosoma cancellatum has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens7

BINs2

Marker genes1

eDNA detections1

Countries1

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type132 records

Wild obs. + sensor54

Museum / vouchered69

Fossil9

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO296 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy78% within 1 km

≤100 m 26≤1 km 5≤10 km 5>10 km 4

40 georeferenced · 14 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor54

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy0% within 1 km

≤10 km 28>10 km 20

48 georeferenced · 21 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence69

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions6 of 11 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
San Diego, US	17
Provo, US	13
San Francisco, US	11
Cambridge, US	7
University of Alberta Museums (UAM)location not on record	6
Zürich, CH	5
Colorado State Universitylocation not on record	3
OSUClocation not on record	2
Royal Saskatchewan Museumlocation not on record	2
Essig Museum of Entomologylocation not on record	2
University Park, US	1

11 institutions · 69 of 69 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA1 detections

Where the DNA of Calosoma cancellatum was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found1

Studies independent surveys1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 1 detections have coordinates

Open the map0 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)