A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Biatoridium monasteriense has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences1
eDNA detections1
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Biatoridium monasteriense voucher PRA-Palice33645 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene and internal transcribed spacer 2, complete sequence; and large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS1
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type2 713 records
Wild obs. + sensor2 212
Museum / vouchered497
Other4
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO5 076 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy93% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 552≤1 km 289≤10 km 135>10 km 3
1 979 georeferenced · 233 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor2 212
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy83% within 1 km
≤100 m 216≤1 km 44≤10 km 49>10 km 6
315 georeferenced · 182 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence497
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions13 of 31 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Olocation not on record
106
Uppsala, SE
75
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
60
Trondheim, NO
49
GZUlocation not on record
28
Bergen, NO
27
BDBClocation not on record
22
BioFokuslocation not on record
14
CJBGlocation not on record
12
LDlocation not on record
11
Helsinki, FI
9
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
9
MeiseBGlocation not on record
7
Stockholm, SE
7
University of Gdansklocation not on record
7
Madison, US
6
Göteborg, SE
5
TSBlocation not on record
5
Repubblica di San Marinolocation not on record
3
Metsähallituslocation not on record
3
nbflocation not on record
3
Staatsarchiv Urilocation not on record
2
Durham, US
2
Trondheim, NO
2
Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden-Institutelocation not on record
1
PHlocation not on record
1
Chicago, US
1
Salzburg, AT
1
NMBU:MINAlocation not on record
1
Philadelphia, US
1
Berlin, DE
1
31 institutions · 481 of 497 vouchered records shown · 16 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA1 detections
Where the DNA of Biatoridium monasteriense was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found1
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 1 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median10.7 °C 10.7–10.7
Seasonal swing summer↔winter22.7 °C
Max temp (day)13.9 °C
Min temp (night)8.10 °C
Precipitation63.1 mm/mo
Air humidity64.7 %
Moisture balance17.6 mm/mo
Vapour deficit455 Pa
Wind speed3.00 m/s
Cloud cover48.6 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
