A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Bagliettoa marmorea has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences9
eDNA detections2
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Bagliettoa marmorea voucher CG1525 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene and internal transcribed spacer 2, complete sequence; and large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS9
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type502 records
Wild obs. + sensor381
Museum / vouchered118
Other3
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO1 552 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy84% within 1 km
≤100 m 189≤1 km 66≤10 km 44>10 km 5
304 georeferenced · 77 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor381
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy64% within 1 km
≤100 m 15≤1 km 21≤10 km 20
56 georeferenced · 62 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence118
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions10 of 22 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
TSBlocation not on record
31
Wuzhou, CN
17
Durham, US
10
Berlin, DE
9
Madison, US
9
BDBClocation not on record
8
Bronx, US
4
Madrid, ES
2
Institute of the Industrial Ecology Problems of the North of Kola Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences.location not on record
2
Philadelphia, US
2
San Sebastián, ES
2
UNITOlocation not on record
2
M-Lichenslocation not on record
2
Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden-Institutelocation not on record
2
GZUlocation not on record
2
AUAlocation not on record
2
Chicago, US
1
Olocation not on record
1
MeiseBGlocation not on record
1
Museo Achille Folettolocation not on record
1
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
1
Uppsala, SE
1
22 institutions · 112 of 118 vouchered records shown · 6 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Bagliettoa marmorea was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median14.5 °C 14.5–14.5
Seasonal swing summer↔winter19.6 °C
Max temp (day)18.9 °C
Min temp (night)9.30 °C
Precipitation72.2 mm/mo
Air humidity58.3 %
Moisture balance-20.6 mm/mo
Vapour deficit782 Pa
Wind speed2.60 m/s
Cloud cover40.9 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
