Averrhoa bilimbi (commonly known as bilimbi, cucumber tree, or tree sorrel) is a fruit-bearing tree of the genus Averrhoa, family Oxalidaceae. It is a close relative of the carambola tree.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Averrhoa bilimbi across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
🍽 Used in cooking
Compound class profile5 classes
Sphingoid bases4
Primary amides3
Fatty alcohols2
Fatty aldehydes2
Flavones1
Documented compounds41 total
Compound
Class
Amount
Source
WATER
947,000 ppm
DukesPhytochem
CARBOHYDRATES
840,000 ppm
DukesPhytochem
PROTEIN
138,000 ppm
DukesPhytochem
FIBER
103,450 ppm
DukesPhytochem
ASH
68,965 ppm
DukesPhytochem
FAT
40,000 ppm
DukesPhytochem
POTASSIUM
17,333 ppm
DukesPhytochem
ASCORBIC-ACID
4,665 ppm
DukesPhytochem
KILOCALORIES
3,600 ppm
DukesPhytochem
PHOSPHORUS
1,915 ppm
DukesPhytochem
05DNA & barcoding5 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Averrhoa bilimbi has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens5
Marker genes3
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections5
Countries3
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK1★rbcL4★ITS5
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualAverrhoa bilimbi carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy82% within 1 km
≤100 m 528≤1 km 156≤10 km 88>10 km 61
833 georeferenced · 267 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 100
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy71% within 1 km
≤100 m 3≤1 km 7≤10 km 4
14 georeferenced · 237 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence251
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 7 records without
Open the mapnot free-living7
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions23 of 57 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Saint Louis, US
13
Salvador, BR
10
Museo Nacional de Costa Rica (MNCR)location not on record
8
Bronx, US
8
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
7
MeiseBGlocation not on record
6
Kew, GB
5
Fort Worth, US
4
UEPAlocation not on record
4
UFBAlocation not on record
4
Moscow State Universitylocation not on record
3
St. Augustine, TT
3
Baroda, IN
3
Taipei, TW
3
Antiguo Cuscatlán, SV
2
National Institute of Biological Resourceslocation not on record
2
UFSClocation not on record
2
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record
2
Claremont, US
2
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
2
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
2
Auckland, NZ
2
Departamento de Sistematica e Ecologialocation not on record
2
Seychelles National Herbariumlocation not on record
2
Berlin, DE
2
Honolulu, US
2
Miami, US
2
Yaoundé, CM
1
Cuiabá, BR
1
UnBlocation not on record
1
CEPLAClocation not on record
1
Museo de Historia Natural de El Salvadorlocation not on record
1
Pondicherry, IN
1
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
1
León, NI
1
Masindi, UG
1
LDlocation not on record
1
JEPSlocation not on record
1
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarinalocation not on record
1
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santolocation not on record
1
UFPIlocation not on record
1
Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)location not on record
1
EL PASO, US
1
JBRJlocation not on record
1
Institut fur Allgemeine Mikrobiologielocation not on record
1
Kensington, AU
1
UFPRlocation not on record
1
Laboratorio de Ictiologialocation not on record
1
Brasília, BR
1
Montréal, CA
1
CMULlocation not on record
1
BISHlocation not on record
1
Gump Stationlocation not on record
1
Universidade Federal do Maranhãolocation not on record
1
Université de Bordeauxlocation not on record
1
Leiden University Medical Centerlocation not on record
1
Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicachlocation not on record
1
57 institutions · 137 of 251 vouchered records shown · 114 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA5 detections
Where the DNA of Averrhoa bilimbi was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found5
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 5 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.