Auricularia fuscosuccinea is a species of edible Auriculariales fungus. It was first described scientifically in 1842 by French mycologist Camille Montagne as a species of Exidia. Paul Christoph Hennings transferred it to Auricularia in 1893.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Auricularia fuscosuccinea has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens23
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections40
Countries7
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10★ITS1
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 473 records
Wild obs. + sensor636
Museum / vouchered835
Other2
Origin
Native1
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO3 764 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy73% within 1 km
≤100 m 238≤1 km 117≤10 km 73>10 km 56
484 georeferenced · 152 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor636
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy28% within 1 km
≤100 m 64≤1 km 55≤10 km 206>10 km 93
418 georeferenced · 417 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence835
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions21 of 52 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Baton Rouge, US
304
IPA/SPlocation not on record
102
UFPElocation not on record
69
Durango, MX
63
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
54
TENN-Flocation not on record
42
PUC-RSlocation not on record
25
Mexico City, MX
11
UEGlocation not on record
9
FLASlocation not on record
9
Fungario QCAM de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuadorlocation not on record
7
Vancouver, CA
7
EcoFoG FunGuy collectionlocation not on record
6
UFSClocation not on record
5
JBRJlocation not on record
5
UNESP-IBILCElocation not on record
5
MeiseBGlocation not on record
4
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)location not on record
4
Helsinki, FI
4
Blumenau, BR
4
Zapopan, MX
4
Schenectady, US
3
Pullman, US
3
Santa Cruz, US
3
UFMSlocation not on record
2
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
2
Olocation not on record
2
Universidad de los Llanos (UniLlanos)location not on record
2
UFPRlocation not on record
2
UTFPR-SLlocation not on record
2
Herbier de Paris(Fr)-MNHNlocation not on record
2
Private Collection of Sarah DeLong-Duhonlocation not on record
1
Mérida, MX
1
Tartu, EE
1
Uppsala, SE
1
IMBIVlocation not on record
1
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
1
Madison, US
1
Guatemala City, GT
1
Feira de Santana, BR
1
Canberra, AU
1
Lake Charles, US
1
Departamento de Sistematica e Ecologialocation not on record
1
Burlington, US
1
Chapel Hill, US
1
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
1
Laboratorio de Ictiologialocation not on record
1
Durham, US
1
ILLSlocation not on record
1
DPIlocation not on record
1
Private Collection of Casey Albrittonlocation not on record
1
National Mushroom Centre, Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, Bhutanlocation not on record
1
52 institutions · 787 of 835 vouchered records shown · 36 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA40 detections
Where the DNA of Auricularia fuscosuccinea was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found40
Studies independent surveys3
Countries7
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 40 detections have coordinates
Open the map7 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median20.4 °C 11.8–25.6
Seasonal swing summer↔winter13.1 °C
Max temp (day)25.9 °C 17.2–29.6
Min temp (night)16.0 °C 8.20–22.3
Precipitation152 mm/mo 31.8–222
Air humidity59.0 % 56.7–64.7
Moisture balance-0.2 mm/mo -48.9–67.7
Vapour deficit990 Pa 542–1,175
Wind speed2.70 m/s 2.30–5.60
Cloud cover38.4 % 29.0–43.1
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 31 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation1 languages↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility1 473 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI40 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics23 specimens↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗