Atriplex suberecta is a species of saltbush known by the common names sprawling saltbush, lagoon saltbush and (in Britain and Ireland) Australian orache. It is native to Australia.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Atriplex suberecta has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens5
Marker genes3
eDNA detections4
Countries1
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★rbcLa★ITS★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB · GIFT · TreeOfSex
The complete instruction manualAtriplex suberecta carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy92% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 712≤1 km 397≤10 km 167>10 km 10
2 286 georeferenced · 129 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor2 415
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy61% within 1 km
≤100 m 149≤1 km 356≤10 km 302>10 km 23
830 georeferenced · 518 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 348
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions60 of 90 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Adelaide, AU
279
Riverside, US
111
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
111
Mount Annan, AU
85
San Diego, US
77
Pretoria, ZA
69
Claremont, US
55
Canberra, AU
49
Santa Barbara, US
42
Kensington, AU
29
Cape Town, ZA
22
Alicante, ES
21
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
20
Irvine, US
18
Mexico City, MX
17
Durango, MX
17
Córdoba, AR
16
Hobart, AU
16
València, ES
15
MAlocation not on record
14
BISHlocation not on record
13
Davis, US
12
Honolulu, US
11
Granada, ES
10
San Luis Obispo, US
10
Mexico City, MX
9
Vitoria, ES
7
Armidale, AU
7
Montecillo, Texcoco, MX
6
Kew, GB
6
San Isidro, AR
6
Universidad del Pais Vasco (UPV/EHU)location not on record
5
Entomological Society of Latvialocation not on record
5
Salamanca, ES
5
Palmerston, AU
4
Odawara, JP
4
Bronx, US
4
Los Angeles, US
4
Provo, US
4
Logan, US
4
CASlocation not on record
4
Brisbane, AU
4
Anchorage, US
4
Flagstaff, US
3
John T. Waterhouse Herbariumlocation not on record
3
NSW Dept of Planning, Industry and Environmentlocation not on record
3
Severin-McDaniel Insect Collectionlocation not on record
3
Museo della Bonifica di San Donà di Piavelocation not on record
3
Juriquilla, MX
3
Saint Louis, US
3
Stockholm, SE
3
MeiseBGlocation not on record
3
Chapingo, MX
3
Moscow State Universitylocation not on record
3
BClocation not on record
2
La Paz, MX
2
BGPAlocation not on record
2
ASUlocation not on record
2
San Sebastián, ES
2
MMHNSRlocation not on record
2
NSW Office of Environment and Heritagelocation not on record
2
Madrid, ES
2
Catalina Island Conservancylocation not on record
2
La Paz, BO
2
Boise, US
1
Zapopan, MX
1
US
1
Parkville, AU
1
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
1
Vancouver, CA
1
Museo Achille Folettolocation not on record
1
Berlin, DE
1
Henderson, US
1
Rishon Le Zion, IL
1
Barcelona, ES
1
ISAlocation not on record
1
Phyletisches Museum Jenalocation not on record
1
Denver, US
1
Frankfurt am Main
1
Wlocation not on record
1
Jena Microbial Resource Collectionlocation not on record
1
Jaén, ES
1
Wuzhou, CN
1
UChlocation not on record
1
Columbia, US
1
Herbario Universidad de Concepciónlocation not on record
1
San Diego Natural History Museum, Herbariumlocation not on record
1
Musee des Dinosaures d'Esperaza (Aude)location not on record
1
Edinburgh, GB
1
AUAlocation not on record
1
90 institutions · 1 310 of 1 348 vouchered records shown · 38 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA4 detections
Where the DNA of Atriplex suberecta was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found4
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 4 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
riparian and marsh vegetation with Salix, Ty…
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median24.2 °C 24.2–24.2
Seasonal swing summer↔winter13.7 °C
Max temp (day)31.8 °C
Min temp (night)18.2 °C
Precipitation10.0 mm/mo
Air humidity52.5 %
Moisture balance-139 mm/mo
Vapour deficit1,438 Pa
Wind speed1.40 m/s
Cloud cover11.5 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation3 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility3 765 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI4 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics5 specimens↗
GRIN TaxonomyUSDA-ARSdistribution & uses↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
CCDBChromosome Counts DB · Tel Aviv U.genome & karyotype↗
giftgenome & karyotype
PloiDBPloidy Databasegenome & karyotype
Tree of SexTree of Sex Consortiumgenome & karyotype↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗