Asclepias viridis is a species of milkweed, a plant in the dogbane family known by the common names green milkweed, green antelopehorn and spider milkweed.(1) (2) The Latin word viridis means green. The plant is native to the midwestern, south central and southeastern United States, as well as to the southeastern portion of the western United States. A. viridis is a perennial forb with alternately arranged leaves. The inflorescence is an umbel of white flowers with purplish centers. Its root system is a taproot, like that of butterfly weed (A. tuberosa). A. viridis grows on many types of soil. It is common in overgrazed pasture land and roadsides.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Asclepias viridis across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Asclepias viridis has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens6
Marker genes3
GenBank sequences6
eDNA detections3
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK2★rbcL4★rbcLa
plant barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type21 538 records
Wild obs. + sensor20 237
Museum / vouchered1 297
Other4
Origin
Native2
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO32 796 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy86% within 1 km
≤100 m 11 445≤1 km 1 695≤10 km 684>10 km 1 375
15 199 georeferenced · 5 038 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor20 237
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy36% within 1 km
≤100 m 106≤1 km 164≤10 km 384>10 km 106
760 georeferenced · 537 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 297
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions59 of 82 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Wuzhou, CN
320
Fort Worth, US
167
Bronx, US
97
Chicago, US
67
Saint Louis, US
64
Austin, US
61
Philadelphia, US
45
DOI/NPS, Mississippi National River & Recreation Arealocation not on record
34
Pittsburg, US
34
Emporia, US
27
Jackson, US
24
Miami, US
21
St. Paul, US
21
US
15
Mississippi State, US
14
Tuscaloosa, US
14
Denton, US
13
Madison, US
13
Fayetteville, US
12
Tampa, US
11
San Angelo, US
10
Texas Lutheran Universitylocation not on record
10
Chadron, US
10
Bangkok, TH
9
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
9
Little Rock, US
9
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
9
Bloomington, US
8
Logan, US
8
Jena Microbial Resource Collectionlocation not on record
7
AUAlocation not on record
7
Musee des Dinosaures d'Esperaza (Aude)location not on record
7
BAYLUlocation not on record
6
Lubbock, US
6
Williamsburg, US
6
Riverside, US
5
Valdosta State Universitylocation not on record
5
Burlington, US
5
EL PASO, US
5
Lincoln, US
4
University of Southern Mississippilocation not on record
4
GB
4
Edmonton, CA
4
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
3
Columbus State Universitylocation not on record
3
Tall Timbers Research Stationlocation not on record
3
Tempe, US
3
Turlock, US
3
Springfield, US
3
Knoxville, US
3
Millersville, US
2
Boise, US
2
Denver, US
2
Chapel Hill, US
2
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
2
Claremont, US
2
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
2
Kew, GB
2
Portland, US
1
Montréal, CA
1
Wlocation not on record
1
Oklahoma State Universitylocation not on record
1
Meguro Parasitological Museumlocation not on record
1
Oskarshamn, SE
1
Pullman, US
1
Clemson, US
1
Mexico City, MX
1
Phoenix, US
1
LINUlocation not on record
1
GAlocation not on record
1
Flagstaff, US
1
DOI/NPS, Greenbelt Parklocation not on record
1
Stephenville, US
1
Richmond, US
1
Waverly, US
1
Minia, EG
1
UMKClocation not on record
1
Cincinnati, US
1
James F. Matthews Center for Biodiversity Studieslocation not on record
1
Taipei, TW
1
Moscow, US
1
Green Bay, US
1
82 institutions · 1 292 of 1 297 vouchered records shown · 5 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA3 detections
Where the DNA of Asclepias viridis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found3
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 3 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median21.7 °C 18.0–24.9
Seasonal swing summer↔winter21.0 °C
Max temp (day)27.5 °C 23.9–30.7
Min temp (night)16.6 °C 12.8–20.2
Precipitation124 mm/mo 113–143
Air humidity57.8 % 56.7–59.3
Moisture balance-7.50 mm/mo -56.6–-7.10
Vapour deficit1,094 Pa 899–1,291
Wind speed3.00 m/s 2.60–3.90
Cloud cover39.4 % 33.5–40.8
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 3 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.