Compounds documented for Asclepias subulata across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Asclepias subulata has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens9
Marker genes5
GenBank sequences5
eDNA detections5
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK★rbcL3★rbcLa★ITS2★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualAsclepias subulata carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Chromosomes2n = 22 n = 11
Ploidydiploid inferred
Chromosome-count records — grouped by value · 2n = full set, n = gamete · click a value for sources & references
2n 221×CCDB · ita-fl
CCDB · ita-fl — PARDI P. - 1933. Studi sulla cariologia delle "Asclepiadaceae".. N. Giorn. Bot. Ital. , 40(4): 576-589.
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy91% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 745≤1 km 221≤10 km 110>10 km 91
2 167 georeferenced · 1 182 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor3 349
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy72% within 1 km
≤100 m 291≤1 km 52≤10 km 107>10 km 28
478 georeferenced · 534 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 012
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions55 of 72 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
San Diego, US
210
Claremont, US
115
Riverside, US
80
ASUlocation not on record
69
Mexico City, MX
66
Saint Louis, US
40
Phoenix, US
35
Chicago, US
29
La Paz, MX
29
Austin, US
25
Flagstaff, US
21
Bronx, US
19
Ensenada, MX
16
Mexico City, MX
15
CASlocation not on record
14
Santa Barbara, US
13
The University of Arizonalocation not on record
13
Arizona State University Biocollectionslocation not on record
11
Hermosillo, MX
10
Logan, US
8
Los Angeles, US
7
Long Beach, US
7
Philadelphia, US
7
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
7
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
6
San Luis Obispo, US
5
Henderson, US
5
DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record
5
Davis, US
5
Severin-McDaniel Insect Collectionlocation not on record
4
St. Paul, US
4
Wuzhou, CN
4
Durham, US
4
Durango, MX
4
EL PASO, US
4
US
4
Fort Worth, US
4
San Jose, US
3
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
3
Lubbock, US
3
Austin, US
3
Kew, GB
3
Tampa, US
3
Mexico City, MX
2
Madison, US
2
Irvine, US
2
Bloomington, US
2
Arcata, US
2
Arizona Western Collegelocation not on record
2
Angwin, US
2
Universidad de Autonoma de Baja Californialocation not on record
2
DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record
2
Tlalnepantla, MX
2
Calabar, NG
2
Minia, EG
2
Provo, US
1
San Diego Natural History Museum, Herbariumlocation not on record
1
San Bernardino, US
1
San Juan College School of Science Math & Engineeringlocation not on record
1
The Huntington Library, Art Museum, and Botanical Gardenslocation not on record
1
San Francisco, US
1
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
1
Moscow, US
1
Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Méxicolocation not on record
1
Chapingo, MX
1
Bangkok, TH
1
San Angelo, US
1
Pocatello, US
1
Dekalb, US
1
Northridge, US
1
Pullman, US
1
Fullerton, US
1
72 institutions · 983 of 1 012 vouchered records shown · 29 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA5 detections
Where the DNA of Asclepias subulata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found5
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 5 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
Creosote Desert Scrub; Rocky canyon bottom
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median7.60 °C 7.60–7.60
Seasonal swing summer↔winter18.1 °C
Max temp (day)13.6 °C
Min temp (night)1.90 °C
Precipitation83.5 mm/mo
Air humidity48.9 %
Moisture balance-6.20 mm/mo
Vapour deficit536 Pa
Wind speed5.70 m/s
Cloud cover40.7 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.