Artomyces pyxidatus
(Pers.) Jülich · speciesAt a glance
Sources12 archives
Databases and archives Artomyces pyxidatus's data was compiled from.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation7 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility31 089 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI28 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics20 specimens↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
LOTUSNatural Products (Wikidata)compounds↗
NPASSNat. Product Activity & Species Sourcecompounds↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
Artomyces pyxidatus is a coral fungus that is commonly called crown coral or crown-tipped coral fungus. Its most characteristic feature is the crown-like shape of the tips of its branches. The epithet pyxidatus means "box-like"—a reference to this shape. Artomyces pyxidatus can be observed throughout Northern Canada during the growing season. In Britain, it was recorded in 2011, almost 116 years after its previous reliable report, a collection made by mycologist Carleton Reale on 20 October 1886. Two subsequent records have been provided in Britain since 2011; one by Yvonne Davidson in Kent in 2018, and one by Cameron Ambler in East Sussex in 2021. It is widespread but uncommon in Western Europe. They are also widely found in the pine forest of Northeastern India (aka The Eight Sisters of India). The fungus produces its hard, coral-like fruiting bodies on growing wood. The colour ranges from cream to semi-tan. The branches rise in ringlike arrangements resembling a crown. Basidia and basidiospores are produced on the surfaces of the branches. These fungi are considered edible when raw, but are better cooked. The fungus are known to be served as meal amongst the tribal groups of Northeastern India since time immemorial. It is best served when fried with chopped potatoes. It is usually found in quantities too small to make a meal. The sesquiterpenes compounds pyxidatols A-C, tsuicoline E and omphadiol have been obtained from the liquid culture of this fungus. DNA evidence and microscopy indicates that the species is closely related to members of the genera Russula and Lentinellus, as well as Auriscalpium vulgare. Other similar species include Clavulina avellanea, C. cristata, C. divaricata, C. piperata, and C. taxophila.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
No structured trait data for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Artomyces pyxidatus across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Compound class profile5 classes
Documented compounds28 total
| Compound | Class | Amount | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| (1S,2aR,3R,4S,4aR,7aS,7bR)-1,3,4-trihydroxy-3-(hydroxymethyl)-6,6,7b-trimethyl-2a,4,4a,5,7,7a-hexahydro-1H-cyclobuta[e]inden-2-one | present | LOTUS | |
| (1S,2R,6R,7R,8S,12R,14S)-2,14-dihydroxy-7,10,10-trimethyl-4,13-dioxatetracyclo[5.5.2.02,6.08,12]tetradecan-5-one | present | LOTUS | |
| (1S,2S,4S,4aR,7aS,7bR)-3-(hydroxymethyl)-6,6,7b-trimethyl-2,4,4a,5,7,7a-hexahydro-1H-cyclobuta[e]indene-1,2,4-triol | present | LOTUS | |
| (2S)-2-ammonio-3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)propanoate | present | NPASS | |
| (5S,5aS,8aR,9S)-5,9-dihydroxy-5,7,7-trimethyl-4,5a,6,8,8a,9-hexahydro-1H-azuleno[5,6-c]furan-3-one | present | LOTUS | |
| (S)-2-hydroxy-3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)propanoic acid | present | NPASS | |
| 1-Propylamine | present | NPASS | |
| 2-[(3aS,7aR)-6-formyl-2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3,3a,7a-tetrahydroinden-5-yl]-2-oxoacetic acid | present | LOTUS | |
| 3-Methyl-1-butylamine | present | NPASS | |
| 4-imidazoleacetate | present | NPASS |
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Artomyces pyxidatus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
The complete instruction manual Artomyces pyxidatus carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
Record type31 089 records
Range
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions43 of 82 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| Olocation not on record | 262 |
| Helsinki, FI | 113 |
| TENN-Flocation not on record | 89 |
| St. Paul, US | 56 |
| SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record | 46 |
| Chicago, US | 33 |
| Toronto, CA | 19 |
| Philadelphia, US | 18 |
| WU-MYClocation not on record | 15 |
| Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record | 15 |
| GJOlocation not on record | 15 |
| Karlsruhe, DE | 14 |
| San Sebastián, ES | 14 |
| Copenhagen, DK | 13 |
| Tomioka, JP | 13 |
| IFR-DNFlocation not on record | 11 |
| BioFokuslocation not on record | 11 |
| Göteborg, SE | 10 |
| Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record | 8 |
| BDBClocation not on record | 7 |
| Turku, FI | 7 |
| National Institute of Biological Resourceslocation not on record | 7 |
| Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record | 7 |
| Bando, JP | 6 |
| Uppsala, SE | 5 |
| Stockholm, SE | 5 |
| Görlitz, DE | 5 |
| Salzburg, AT | 5 |
| nsnflocation not on record | 4 |
| Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record | 4 |
| UFSClocation not on record | 4 |
| Kensington, AU | 4 |
| V. N. Karazin National Universitylocation not on record | 4 |
| Kuopio, FI | 4 |
| BRNUlocation not on record | 4 |
| LDlocation not on record | 3 |
| Warsaw, PL | 3 |
| JA-CAGPDS-CAMlocation not on record | 3 |
| MAlocation not on record | 3 |
| TROMlocation not on record | 3 |
| Metsähallituslocation not on record | 3 |
| University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record | 3 |
| MeiseBGlocation not on record | 3 |
| Tartu, EE | 2 |
| Provincia di Livornolocation not on record | 2 |
| CJBGlocation not on record | 2 |
| NAlocation not on record | 2 |
| Durham, US | 2 |
| Ann Arbor, US | 2 |
| DPIlocation not on record | 2 |
| Mlocation not on record | 2 |
| Bardejov, SK | 2 |
| Trondheim, NO | 2 |
| Lausanne, CH | 2 |
| Oulu, FI | 2 |
| Valdosta State Universitylocation not on record | 2 |
| University of Warsawlocation not on record | 2 |
| Chapel Hill, US | 2 |
| Tilburg, NL | 2 |
| Asheville, US | 2 |
| Ciudad de México, MX | 2 |
| Brisbane, AU | 2 |
| Kew, GB | 2 |
| Gijón, ES | 1 |
| Denver, US | 1 |
| Personal Collection of Troy Howardlocation not on record | 1 |
| Mérida, ES | 1 |
| Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record | 1 |
| Trondheim, NO | 1 |
| Vitoria, ES | 1 |
| Umeå Universitylocation not on record | 1 |
| Canberra, AU | 1 |
| Tampa, US | 1 |
| Natural History Museum, Tribhuvan Universitylocation not on record | 1 |
| Hobart, AU | 1 |
| Parkville, AU | 1 |
| Davis and Elkins Collegelocation not on record | 1 |
| PHlocation not on record | 1 |
| TUR-Alocation not on record | 1 |
| Pullman, US | 1 |
| Berlin, DE | 1 |
| TFC Miclocation not on record | 1 |
Where the DNA of Artomyces pyxidatus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.