Arrhenia lobata is a species of agaric fungus in the family Hygrophoraceae. It is found in the Iberian Peninsula and central Europe, and North America. It associates with mosses and may have a parasitic relationship with them.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Arrhenia lobata has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens15
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections19
Countries6
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Arrhenia lobata voucher AMB 19562 small subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence; internal transcribed spacer 1 and 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 147 records
Wild obs. + sensor607
Museum / vouchered536
Other4
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO2 996 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy41% within 1 km
≤100 m 153≤1 km 74≤10 km 325>10 km 5
557 georeferenced · 50 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor607
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy75% within 1 km
≤100 m 40≤1 km 203≤10 km 78>10 km 5
326 georeferenced · 210 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence536
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions25 of 45 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
TROMlocation not on record
145
Copenhagen, DK
71
Olocation not on record
69
34
WTUlocation not on record
26
Trondheim, NO
15
Helsinki, FI
12
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
9
CA
8
WU-MYClocation not on record
7
Denver, US
6
Tromso University Museumlocation not on record
5
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
5
Vancouver, CA
5
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
4
Salzburg, AT
3
California State University, East Baylocation not on record
3
Kew, GB
3
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
3
Toronto, CA
3
Fungarium of Yugra State Universitylocation not on record
2
San Sebastián, ES
2
Karlsruhe, DE
2
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
2
Uppsala, SE
2
Oulu, FI
2
Kuopio, FI
1
Chicago, US
1
Tartu, EE
1
Trondheim, NO
1
Joensuu, FI
1
IB FRC Komi SC UB RASlocation not on record
1
Turku, FI
1
Mlocation not on record
1
MeiseBGlocation not on record
1
Stockholm, SE
1
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
1
Royal Ontario Museum, TRTC Fungariumlocation not on record
1
JA-CAGPDS-CAMlocation not on record
1
nsnflocation not on record
1
Bronx, US
1
Zürich, CH
1
Philadelphia, US
1
GJOlocation not on record
1
Göteborg, SE
1
45 institutions · 467 of 536 vouchered records shown · 69 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA19 detections
Where the DNA of Arrhenia lobata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found19
Studies independent surveys3
Countries6
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median6.50 °C 3.50–12.6
Seasonal swing summer↔winter20.6 °C
Max temp (day)8.20 °C 4.30–19.6
Min temp (night)4.20 °C 1.70–6.70
Precipitation51.7 mm/mo 23.7–155
Air humidity64.5 % 43.4–71.4
Moisture balance35.6 mm/mo
Vapour deficit313 Pa 235–780
Wind speed5.50 m/s
Cloud cover57.5 % 15.3–78.1
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 17 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.