Aristolochia esperanzae Kuntze – gatunek rośliny z rodziny kokornakowatych. Występuje naturalnie w Boliwii, Paragwaju, północnej części Argentyny i Brazylii
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Aristolochia esperanzae across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Aristolochia esperanzae has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens2
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences2
eDNA detections2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Aristolochia esperanzae maturase K (matK) gene, partial cds; chloroplast
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK2
plant barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualAristolochia esperanzae carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Chromosomes2n = 14 n = 7
Chromosome-count records — grouped by value · 2n = full set, n = gamete · click a value for sources & references
2n 141×CCDB · Automatic manuscript search
CCDB · Automatic manuscript search — R. Berjano,F. Roa,S. Talavera and M. Guerra. 2009. "Cytotaxonomy of diploid and polyploid Aristolochia (Aristolochiaceae) species based on the distribution of CMA/DAPI bands and 5S and 45S rDNA sites". Plant Systematics and Evolution 280:219-227.
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type408 records
Wild obs. + sensor30
Museum / vouchered374
Other4
Origin
Native203
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO764 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy42% within 1 km
≤100 m 5≤1 km 3≤10 km 5>10 km 6
19 georeferenced · 11 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor30
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy0% within 1 km
≤10 km 4>10 km 1
5 georeferenced · 369 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence374
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions22 of 55 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
UNESP-ISlocation not on record
65
Campo Grande, BR
53
UFMSlocation not on record
39
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
38
Centro de Pesquisas Agropecuarias do Tropico Umidolocation not on record
15
Jataí / Setor Industrial, BR
11
Ivano-Frankivsk, UA
11
UnBlocation not on record
10
Istituto Agrario Castelnuovolocation not on record
9
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campus do Pantanallocation not on record
8
INMAlocation not on record
7
IPA/SPlocation not on record
7
Minia, EG
6
Saint Louis, US
6
UNESP-IBILCElocation not on record
5
Kew, GB
5
Santa Cruz de la Sierra, BO
5
CJBGlocation not on record
4
UNICAMPlocation not on record
4
Frankfurt am Main
4
UNESP-FCAlocation not on record
4
Bronx, US
3
Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreallocation not on record
3
JBPlocation not on record
3
UNESP, Campus São José Rio Prêtolocation not on record
3
Santa Teresa, BR
3
Brasília, BR
2
ASUlocation not on record
2
Ural Federal University "B. N. Yeltsin"location not on record
2
Salvador, BR
2
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
2
JBRJlocation not on record
2
Bogotá, D.C., CO
2
UTFPR-CPlocation not on record
2
South Kensington, GB
2
Uberlândia, BR
2
USP-IBlocation not on record
2
Chicago, US
2
Cenargenlocation not on record
2
Laboratorio de Ictiologialocation not on record
2
Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)location not on record
1
La Paz, BO
1
Centro de Estudios y Colecciones Biológicas para la Conservaciónlocation not on record
1
UFSCarlocation not on record
1
Blumenau, BR
1
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chilelocation not on record
1
UNITINSlocation not on record
1
Masindi, UG
1
Wlocation not on record
1
Londrina, BR
1
Campo Mourão, BR
1
Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeirolocation not on record
1
Universidade Paulistalocation not on record
1
Chaguaramas, TT
1
UNESP-RClocation not on record
1
55 institutions · 374 of 374 vouchered records shown
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Aristolochia esperanzae was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.