Arima marginata

(Fabricius, 1781) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Coleoptera/Chrysomelidae/Arima

At a glance

Occurrence records897

Data sources7

Biological traits0

DNA specimens7

eDNA detections5

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Arima marginata's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation4 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility897 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI5 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics7 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF897 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 2 countries5 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD7 specimens

01Narrative

Arima marginata is a species of leaf beetles of the subfamily Galerucinae in the family Chrysomelidae.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding7 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Arima marginata has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens7

BINs3

Marker genes1

eDNA detections5

Countries2

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P658 bp consensus7 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 92% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Where individuals differ — all 52 variable positions, in barcode order

7Avariable

28Avariable

34Tvariable

82Tvariable

85Cvariable

88Avariable

103Tvariable

106Cvariable

124Tvariable

133Tvariable

139Avariable

145Tvariable

163Avariable

184Avariable

197Tvariable

202Tvariable

214Tvariable

295Avariable

304Tmostly conserved

319Tvariable

322Avariable

328Tmostly conserved

343Cvariable

346Tvariable

349Amostly conserved

355Tvariable

382Avariable

391Avariable

412Tvariable

424Tvariable

436Tvariable

448Tvariable

451Tvariable

455Avariable

457Tvariable

478Avariable

508Avariable

518Gvariable

523Tvariable

529Tvariable

536Tvariable

538Avariable

577Avariable

581Cvariable

601Tvariable

604Tmostly conserved

607Cvariable

616Cvariable

628Gvariable

631Tvariable

634Cvariable

637Tvariable

AACATTATATTTTATTTTTGGTATTTGAGCAGGTATAATTGGAACTTCATTAAGAATTTTAGTACGAGCTGAATTAGGAAATCCCGGAAC …

Variant network

Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.

Diversity (π)3.8%

Haplotypes5

BINs3

Most divergent pair5.9%

Europe

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Neogalerucella calmariensissame family10.3%Neogalerucella pusillasame family10.5%Tricholochmaea kalmiaesame family10.6%Galerucella tenellasame family10.6%Monolepta signatasame family10.9%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type897 records

Wild obs. + sensor821

Museum / vouchered76

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO2 084 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy67% within 1 km

≤100 m 313≤1 km 141≤10 km 209>10 km 13

676 georeferenced · 145 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor821

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy70% within 1 km

≤100 m 2≤1 km 44≤10 km 20

66 georeferenced · 10 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence76

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Institution	Specimens
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record	43
Laboratorium voor Microbiologie der Landbouwhogeschoollocation not on record	3

2 institutions · 46 of 76 vouchered records shown · 30 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA5 detections

Where the DNA of Arima marginata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found5

Studies independent surveys1

Countries2

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 5 detections have coordinates

Open the map2 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median18.2 °C 15.0–18.5

Seasonal swing summer↔winter16.4 °C

Max temp (day)20.7 °C 17.9–21.6

Min temp (night)13.2 °C 10.3–14.2

Precipitation81.0 mm/mo 62.0–99.2

Air humidity60.8 % 58.3–61.5

Moisture balance-59.4 mm/mo -81.6–-26.6

Vapour deficit818 Pa 691–842

Wind speed2.10 m/s 1.90–3.00

Cloud cover39.3 % 37.3–40.0

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 5 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)