Arceuthobium vaginatum, called the "sheathed dwarf mistletoe" or "southwestern dwarf mistletoe" is a parasitic plant found in the southwestern United States and northwestern and central Mexico. It generally is found on pine (Pinus spp) trees.Hawksworth, F.G., & D. Wiens. 1993. Viscaceae, Mistletoe Family. Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science 27:241-245Presl, J.S. O Prirozenosti rostlin, aneb rostlinar 2: 28. 1825.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Arceuthobium vaginatum has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
eDNA detections1
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualArceuthobium vaginatum carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Chromosomes2n = 28 n = 14
Ploidydiploid inferred
Chromosome-count records — grouped by value · 2n = full set, n = gamete · click a value for sources & references
2n 281×CCDB · book-fedorov
CCDB · book-fedorov — Wiens 1964a
n 141×CCDB · book-ipcn67-71
CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 — WIENS, D. 1968. Chromosomal and flowering characteristics in dwarf mistletoes (Arceuthoblum). Amer J. Bot. 55: 325-334.
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin11.5 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type535 records
Wild obs. + sensor190
Museum / vouchered345
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO1 548 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy89% within 1 km
≤100 m 100≤1 km 31≤10 km 11>10 km 5
147 georeferenced · 43 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor190
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy83% within 1 km
≤100 m 158≤1 km 26≤10 km 26>10 km 11
221 georeferenced · 124 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence345
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions46 of 59 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Durango, MX
68
Austin, US
38
Chapingo, MX
29
ASUlocation not on record
18
Saint Louis, US
15
Flagstaff, US
15
Mexico City, MX
15
Mexico City, MX
13
EL PASO, US
12
Austin, US
11
Logan, US
9
Albuquerque, US
8
Denver, US
6
Mexico City, MX
6
San Angelo, US
5
Bronx, US
4
Bangkok, TH
4
DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record
4
Puebla, MX
4
Phoenix, US
3
Guasave, MX
3
Giardini Botanici Hanburylocation not on record
3
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
2
Orem, US
2
Bloomington, US
2
Musee des Dinosaures d'Esperaza (Aude)location not on record
2
San Luis Obispo, US
2
USFSlocation not on record
2
US
2
Emporia, US
2
Richmond, US
2
Kew, GB
1
Edinburgh, GB
1
MEXUlocation not on record
1
Mérida, MX
1
Hermosillo, MX
1
Tampa, US
1
Dekalb, US
1
Pullman, US
1
Paris, FR
1
Ciudad de México, MX
1
RBGlocation not on record
1
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
1
Torreón, MX
1
Durango, US
1
DOI/NPS, Greenbelt Parklocation not on record
1
Wuzhou, CN
1
Tuxtla Gutiérrez, MX
1
Linares, MX
1
Riverside, US
1
Santa Barbara, US
1
Valdosta State Universitylocation not on record
1
Montecillo, Texcoco, MX
1
Tlalnepantla, MX
1
Guatemala City, GT
1
Burlington, US
1
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
1
MeiseBGlocation not on record
1
Tapachula, MX
1
59 institutions · 339 of 345 vouchered records shown · 6 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA1 detections
Where the DNA of Arceuthobium vaginatum was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found1
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 1 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.