Apoplanesia paniculata – gatunek drzew z rodziny bobowatych. Występuje w Ameryce Centralnej na obszarze od Kostaryki po południowy i wschodni Meksyk. Uprawiany jest jako roślina ozdobna. Z kory pozyskiwany jest żółty barwnik. Ważna roślina miododajna. Bardzo twarde drewno wykorzystywane jest do wyrobu mebli, w rzemieślnictwie, a także do wytwarzania łuków.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Apoplanesia paniculata has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens7
Marker genes5
GenBank sequences9
eDNA detections6
Countries3
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK3★rbcL2★rbcLa★ITS4★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
07Deep time~14.2 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin14.2 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type934 records
Wild obs. + sensor68
Museum / vouchered863
Other3
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO1 708 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy97% within 1 km
≤100 m 28≤1 km 9>10 km 1
38 georeferenced · 30 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor68
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy95% within 1 km
≤100 m 371≤1 km 8≤10 km 17>10 km 3
399 georeferenced · 464 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence863
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions33 of 50 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Mexico City, MX
196
Durango, MX
164
Saint Louis, US
152
Mérida, MX
63
Austin, US
34
Kew, GB
33
Sociedad para el Estudio de los Recursos Bióticos de Oaxaca, A. C.location not on record
27
Ann Arbor, US
25
MEXUlocation not on record
19
CASlocation not on record
11
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record
11
Austin, US
11
León, NI
11
Tapachula, MX
10
San Francisco de Campeche, MX
8
Riverside, US
8
Museo Nacional de Costa Rica (MNCR)location not on record
8
Chapingo, MX
7
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
6
IANIGLAlocation not on record
4
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
4
LDlocation not on record
3
Mérida, MX
3
Davis, US
3
Mexico City, MX
3
Guatemala City, GT
3
San José, CR
3
Sociedad Para el Estudio de los Recursos Bioticos de Oaxacalocation not on record
2
Tuxtla Gutiérrez, MX
2
Mississippi State, US
2
Giardini Botanici Hanburylocation not on record
2
Phoenix, US
2
Tlalnepantla, MX
2
Area de Conservacion Guanacastelocation not on record
1
Berlin, DE
1
Fort Worth, US
1
Centro Cultural Santo Domingolocation not on record
1
Puebla, MX
1
Edinburgh, GB
1
Autlán de Navarro, MX
1
IEBlocation not on record
1
Managua, NI
1
Elocation not on record
1
Flagstaff, US
1
Chicago, US
1
Mexico City, MX
1
Juriquilla, MX
1
Tampa, US
1
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Instituto de Biologialocation not on record
1
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
1
50 institutions · 859 of 863 vouchered records shown · 3 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA6 detections
Where the DNA of Apoplanesia paniculata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found6
Studies independent surveys1
Countries3
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 6 detections have coordinates
Open the map3 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median25.6 °C 24.8–27.5
Seasonal swing summer↔winter2.40 °C
Max temp (day)28.4 °C 27.8–31.1
Min temp (night)23.0 °C 21.6–25.0
Precipitation66.2 mm/mo 11.7–219
Air humidity61.8 % 58.4–66.4
Moisture balance-119 mm/mo -139–82.6
Vapour deficit1,312 Pa 1,086–1,419
Wind speed2.30 m/s 1.30–4.90
Cloud cover28.8 % 18.6–30.9
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 5 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.