Apocynum × floribundum ou « Intermediate dogbane », l'apocyn intermédiaire, est une espèce de la famille des Apocynaceae. Il est répandu au Canada, aux États-Unis et dans le nord du Mexique.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Apocynum floribundum across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Apocynum floribundum has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
Marker genes3
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections1
Countries2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK4★rbcL2★ITS4
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceGoaT
The complete instruction manualApocynum floribundum carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size244 500 000 bp
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
THIS GENOME Apocynum floribundum0.24 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type497 records
Wild obs. + sensor126
Museum / vouchered371
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO1 564 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy81% within 1 km
≤100 m 62≤1 km 20≤10 km 6>10 km 13
101 georeferenced · 25 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor126
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy42% within 1 km
≤100 m 18≤1 km 61≤10 km 98>10 km 11
188 georeferenced · 183 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence371
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions50 of 68 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Bloomington, US
22
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
21
Burlington, US
17
Madison, US
17
Wuzhou, CN
16
Flagstaff, US
15
St. Paul, US
15
Denver, US
14
Montréal, CA
14
Chadron, US
13
Albuquerque, US
12
Corvallis, US
11
Claremont, US
11
Saint Louis, US
10
Boise, US
9
Ann Arbor, US
9
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
8
Little Rock, US
8
Riverside, US
7
Vancouver, CA
6
ASUlocation not on record
6
Saint John, CA
6
Caldwell, US
5
GB
5
Phoenix, US
5
Missoula, US
5
Toronto, CA
4
University of Alberta Museumslocation not on record
4
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
4
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
4
San Luis Obispo, US
3
Orem, US
3
Dekalb, US
3
Musee des Dinosaures d'Esperaza (Aude)location not on record
3
Victoria, CA
3
Appalachian State Universitylocation not on record
3
Mississippi State, US
2
Green Bay, US
2
Lincoln, US
2
Bronx, US
2
Grand Junction, US
2
WTUlocation not on record
2
Logan, US
2
Russellville, US
2
Provo, US
2
Fort Worth, US
2
San Angelo, US
2
Jackson, US
1
Pullman, US
1
AUAlocation not on record
1
Beijing, CN
1
cslocation not on record
1
College Park, US
1
Columbia, US
1
University of British Columbia, Herbariumlocation not on record
1
Millersville, US
1
Lord Fairfax Community Collegelocation not on record
1
Moscow, US
1
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
1
Brookings, US
1
Université Lavallocation not on record
1
Québec, CA
1
Weber State Universitylocation not on record
1
Pocatello, US
1
USFSlocation not on record
1
Henderson, US
1
Fayetteville, US
1
CASlocation not on record
1
68 institutions · 364 of 371 vouchered records shown · 7 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA1 detections
Where the DNA of Apocynum floribundum was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found1
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 1 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median16.2 °C 16.2–16.2
Seasonal swing summer↔winter22.6 °C
Max temp (day)22.2 °C
Min temp (night)10.4 °C
Precipitation27.9 mm/mo
Air humidity53.4 %
Moisture balance-113 mm/mo
Vapour deficit862 Pa
Wind speed2.10 m/s
Cloud cover38.0 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.