Apiomorpha conica

(Froggatt, 1893) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Hemiptera/Eriococcidae/Apiomorpha

At a glance

Occurrence records72

Data sources6

Biological traits0

DNA specimens8

eDNA detections6

Sources6 archives

Databases and archives Apiomorpha conica's data was compiled from.

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility72 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI6 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics8 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

Tree of SexTree of Sex Consortiumgenome & karyotype↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page3 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

Occurrence & distributionGBIF72 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries6 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD8 specimens

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding8 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Apiomorpha conica has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens8

BINs2

Marker genes1

eDNA detections6

Countries1

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type72 records

Wild obs. + sensor52

Museum / vouchered20

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO232 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy88% within 1 km

≤100 m 16≤1 km 12≤10 km 2>10 km 2

32 georeferenced · 20 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor52

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤100 m 1

1 georeferenced · 19 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence20

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Institution	Specimens
DPIlocation not on record	16
Centre for Biodiversity Genomicslocation not on record	2
NSW Dept of Planning, Industry and Environmentlocation not on record	1

3 institutions · 19 of 20 vouchered records shown · 1 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA6 detections

Where the DNA of Apiomorpha conica was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found6

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 6 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median12.5 °C 10.5–12.5

Seasonal swing summer↔winter14.2 °C

Max temp (day)18.2 °C 16.2–18.2

Min temp (night)6.90 °C 5.30–6.90

Precipitation66.0 mm/mo 60.4–66.0

Air humidity58.8 % 58.8–59.5

Moisture balance-42.3 mm/mo -42.3–-28.7

Vapour deficit597 Pa 518–597

Wind speed2.80 m/s

Cloud cover17.0 % 17.0–18.5

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 6 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)