Apiomerus pictipes

Herrich-Schaeffer, 1846 · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Hemiptera/Reduviidae/Apiomerus

At a glance

Occurrence records538

Data sources5

Biological traits0

DNA specimens9

eDNA detections3

Sources5 archives

Databases and archives Apiomerus pictipes's data was compiled from.

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility538 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI3 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics9 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page3 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

Occurrence & distributionGBIF538 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 0 countries3 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD9 specimens

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding9 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Apiomerus pictipes has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens9

Marker genes1

eDNA detections3

Countries2

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-3P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type538 records

Wild obs. + sensor82

Museum / vouchered456

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO704 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy74% within 1 km

≤100 m 26≤1 km 19≤10 km 15>10 km 1

61 georeferenced · 21 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor82

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy63% within 1 km

≤1 km 5≤10 km 1>10 km 2

8 georeferenced · 448 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence456

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions5 of 13 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record	264
San Francisco, US	111
Tapachula, MX	32
Durango, MX	15
Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH)location not on record	14
Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, Costa Ricalocation not on record	5
Australian National Insect Collectionlocation not on record	5
Natural History Museum of Utahlocation not on record	4
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (UNAL)location not on record	2
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institutelocation not on record	1
Lubbock, US	1
MX	1
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record	1

13 institutions · 456 of 456 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA3 detections

Where the DNA of Apiomerus pictipes was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found3

Studies independent surveys1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 3 detections have coordinates

Open the map0 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)