Apiastrum is a monotypic genus of flowering plant in the Apiaceae, containing the single species Apiastrum angustifolium, which is known by the common name mock parsley. It is native to California and Baja California, where it is resident in many types of habitat. This is an annual herb producing a branching stem up to half a meter tall from a taproot. Leaves are plentiful along the stem, each up to about 5 centimeters long and split into many narrow lobes. Several inflorescences arise from the stem, often but not always from leaf axils. The inflorescence is a compound umbel of tiny flowers each with five pointed white petals.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Apiastrum angustifolium has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens5
Marker genes5
GenBank sequences5
eDNA detections3
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK1★rbcL1★rbcLa★ITS3★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualApiastrum angustifolium carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Chromosomes2n = 22 n = 11
Ploidydiploid inferred
Chromosome-count records — grouped by value · 2n = full set, n = gamete · click a value for sources & references
2n 221×CCDB · book-fedorov
CCDB · book-fedorov — Bell, Constance 1966
n 112×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl · CCDB · book-ipcn66
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Constance, L., T. i. Chuang & C. R. Bell. 1976. Chromosome numbers in Umbelliferae. V. Amer. J. Bot. 63(5): 608–625.
CCDB · book-ipcn66 — Bell & Constance 1966
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy91% within 1 km
≤100 m 199≤1 km 14≤10 km 5>10 km 16
234 georeferenced · 145 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor379
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy66% within 1 km
≤100 m 142≤1 km 274≤10 km 201>10 km 11
628 georeferenced · 659 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 287
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions39 of 52 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
San Diego, US
327
Santa Barbara, US
162
Claremont, US
162
Riverside, US
154
San Luis Obispo, US
66
US
39
Davis, US
33
Los Angeles, US
29
Irvine, US
23
Severin-McDaniel Insect Collectionlocation not on record
19
DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record
12
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
11
Angwin, US
11
Phoenix, US
11
ASUlocation not on record
8
Santa Cruz, US
8
Ensenada, MX
7
Bronx, US
7
Arizona State University Biocollectionslocation not on record
6
Mexico City, MX
6
Long Beach, US
6
Calabar, NG
6
Austin, US
6
Austin, US
5
CASlocation not on record
5
Saint Louis, US
5
Arcata, US
4
San Jose, US
3
Northridge, US
3
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
3
Wuzhou, CN
2
Catalina Island Conservancylocation not on record
2
EL PASO, US
2
South Kensington, GB
2
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
2
Hermosillo, MX
1
Bloomington, US
1
Pullman, US
1
Durango, MX
1
GB
1
DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record
1
Missoula, US
1
Bangkok, TH
1
LDlocation not on record
1
The University of Arizonalocation not on record
1
Tampa, US
1
Henderson, US
1
Philadelphia, US
1
Albuquerque, US
1
La Paz, MX
1
San Diego Natural History Museum, Herbariumlocation not on record
1
New Haven, US
1
52 institutions · 1 174 of 1 287 vouchered records shown · 113 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA3 detections
Where the DNA of Apiastrum angustifolium was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found3
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 3 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
Coastal Sage Scrub/Chaparral with Quercus ag…
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median14.9 °C 14.9–14.9
Seasonal swing summer↔winter7.60 °C
Max temp (day)18.0 °C
Min temp (night)11.6 °C
Precipitation40.1 mm/mo
Air humidity64.1 %
Moisture balance-69.6 mm/mo
Vapour deficit606 Pa
Wind speed3.50 m/s
Cloud cover32.3 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.