Aphrodita negligens — The Life Data

Animalia/Annelida/Polychaeta/Phyllodocida/Aphroditidae/Aphrodita

At a glance

Occurrence records70

Data sources7

Biological traits2

DNA specimens1

eDNA detections1

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Aphrodita negligens's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility43 records↗

OBISOcean Biodiversity Information System27 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI1 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics1 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗

On this page5 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Traits & measurements1 literature sources2 traits

Occurrence & distributionGBIF · OBIS70 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 0 countries1 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD1 specimens

01Narrative

Aphrodita negligens is een borstelworm uit de familie Aphroditidae. Het lichaam van de worm bestaat uit een kop, een cilindrisch, gesegmenteerd lichaam en een staartstukje. De kop bestaat uit een prostomium en een peristomium en draagt gepaarde aanhangsels. Aphrodita negligens werd in 1905 voor het eerst wetenschappelijk beschreven door Moore.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

SourcesSeaLifeBase

Habitat & environment2

Habitat saltwateryes

Habitat zonebenthic

05DNA & barcoding1 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Aphrodita negligens has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections1

Marker genes sequenced

18S-5P

ribosomal

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type70 records

Wild obs. + sensor3

Museum / vouchered66

Other1

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO164 km²

Depth

0–200 m sunlit15

200–1000 m twilight6

1–4 km midnight0

>4 km abyssal0

median 95.1 m · max 365.8 m · 21 records with depth

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤1 km 1

1 georeferenced · 2 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor3

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy56% within 1 km

≤100 m 7≤1 km 8≤10 km 7>10 km 5

27 georeferenced · 39 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence66

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions5 of 9 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
CASlocation not on record	12
Victoria, CA	6
Washington, US	6
Los Angeles, US	5
Santa Barbara Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record	4
WoRMS Editorial Boardlocation not on record	3
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record	2
Edmonton, CA	1
Frankfurt am Main	1

9 institutions · 40 of 66 vouchered records shown · 1 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA1 detections

Where the DNA of Aphrodita negligens was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found1

Studies independent surveys1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 1 detections have coordinates

Open the map0 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.