A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Apeiba membranacea has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences3
eDNA detections3
Countries2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Apeiba membranacea culture STRI:Corteva SJWright MP00224 small subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence; internal transcribed spacer 1, 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, and internal transcribed spacer 2, complete sequence; and large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★rbcL1★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 719 records
Wild obs. + sensor471
Museum / vouchered1 248
Origin
Native90
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO2 976 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy83% within 1 km
≤100 m 157≤1 km 36≤10 km 23>10 km 16
232 georeferenced · 239 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor471
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy26% within 1 km
≤100 m 5≤1 km 12≤10 km 36>10 km 12
65 georeferenced · 1 183 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 248
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions29 of 71 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Saint Louis, US
333
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
160
Chicago, US
129
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record
79
Bronx, US
66
Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas - SINCHIlocation not on record
48
Museo Nacional de Costa Rica (MNCR)location not on record
42
Kew, GB
34
QCNElocation not on record
34
Universidad de Antioquia (UdeA)location not on record
19
León, NI
16
San José, CR
15
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (UNAL)location not on record
13
MAlocation not on record
13
Universiti Sains Malaysialocation not on record
12
Herbario Selva Central Oxapampa - estación biológica del Jardín Botánico de Missourilocation not on record
11
Universidad Tecnológica del Chocó (UTCH)location not on record
11
ASUlocation not on record
11
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)location not on record
10
La Paz, BO
10
Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH)location not on record
8
Aarhus, DK
8
arosemena tola, EC
8
Xiamen, CN
7
Fort Worth, US
7
HUT Culture Collectionlocation not on record
6
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
6
Iquitos, PE
6
JBRJlocation not on record
5
UNESP-FCAlocation not on record
5
Lima, PE
5
Durham, US
5
Santa Cruz de la Sierra, BO
4
Mexico City, MX
3
Riobamba, EC
3
Ann Arbor, US
3
Universidad Industrial de Santander (UIS)location not on record
2
Cusco, PE
2
Universidad de Nariño (UdeNar)location not on record
2
Institut fur Allgemeine Mikrobiologielocation not on record
2
CJBGlocation not on record
2
IPA/SPlocation not on record
2
Fundación Jardín Botánico Joaquín Antonio Uribe de Medellínlocation not on record
2
Quito, EC
2
Mexico City, MX
2
Wlocation not on record
2
Santarém, BR
1
Berlin, DE
1
HUAlocation not on record
1
Station d'Ecologie de Lamtolocation not on record
1
Universität Göttingenlocation not on record
1
Dirección Nacional Forestal, Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganaderíalocation not on record
1
Tampa, US
1
Río Palenque Science Centerlocation not on record
1
Porto Velho, BR
1
UFAClocation not on record
1
COLlocation not on record
1
Laboratorio de Ictiologialocation not on record
1
Managua, NI
1
Universidad de Caldas (UCaldas)location not on record
1
GeoPark Colombia S.A.S (GeoPark)location not on record
1
Instituto para la Investigación y la Preservación del Patrimonio Cultural y Natural del Valle del Cauca - INCIVAlocation not on record
1
Miami, US
1
Universidad del Quindío (UniQuindío)location not on record
1
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
1
UTPLlocation not on record
1
Stockholm, SE
1
St. Paul, US
1
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldilocation not on record
1
Universidad Católica de Oriente (UCO)location not on record
1
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (PUJ)location not on record
1
71 institutions · 1 200 of 1 248 vouchered records shown · 48 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA3 detections
Where the DNA of Apeiba membranacea was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found3
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 3 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median22.8 °C 22.8–22.8
Seasonal swing summer↔winter2.70 °C
Max temp (day)27.1 °C
Min temp (night)19.4 °C
Precipitation56.7 mm/mo
Air humidity63.6 %
Moisture balance-41.5 mm/mo
Vapour deficit1,006 Pa
Wind speed1.00 m/s
Cloud cover31.8 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 3 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.