Anurocampa mingens

Herrich-Schäffer, 1854 · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Lepidoptera/Notodontidae/Anurocampa

At a glance

Occurrence records227

Data sources6

Biological traits0

DNA specimens8

eDNA detections7

Sources6 archives

Databases and archives Anurocampa mingens's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility227 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI7 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics8 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF227 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 2 countries7 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD8 specimens

01Narrative

Anurocampa mingens is een vlinder uit de familie van de tandvlinders (Notodontidae). De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1854 door Herrich-Schäffer.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding8 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anurocampa mingens has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens8

BINs2

Marker genes1

eDNA detections7

Countries3

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P658 bp consensus7 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 93% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Where individuals differ — all 46 variable positions, in barcode order

19Cvariable

34Tvariable

40Avariable

56Cvariable

58Tvariable

91Avariable

157Tvariable

169Tvariable

190Tvariable

202Tvariable

205Tvariable

214Tvariable

217Gvariable

232Tvariable

259Tvariable

283Gvariable

304Tmostly conserved

340Cvariable

346Avariable

352Cvariable

355Tvariable

364Cvariable

388Avariable

400Tvariable

403Amostly conserved

412Gvariable

421Tvariable

451Tvariable

466Gvariable

470Cvariable

472Tvariable

517Avariable

541Cvariable

557Cvariable

562Avariable

565Avariable

574Tvariable

577Avariable

580Tvariable

616Cvariable

619Avariable

625Avariable

628Gmostly conserved

634Cvariable

637Avariable

641Tvariable

AACATTATATTTTATTTTCGGAATTTGAGCTGGTATAGTAGGAACTTCTCTTAGTCTTTTAATTCGAGCTGAATTAGGAACCCCAGGATC …

Variant network

Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.

Diversity (π)3.9%

Haplotypes4

BINs2

Most divergent pair7.0%

S.America

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Anurocampa markhastingsisame genus5.8%Lobeza minorsame family7.4%Elaphria mesoleucasame order8.2%Lobeza medinasame family8.2%Thoracolopha spilocrossasame order8.5%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type227 records

Wild obs. + sensor96

Museum / vouchered130

Other1

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO364 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy74% within 1 km

≤100 m 43≤1 km 17≤10 km 11>10 km 10

81 georeferenced · 15 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor96

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy0% within 1 km

≤10 km 1

1 georeferenced · 129 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence130

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Institution	Specimens
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record	102
Natural History Museum of Utahlocation not on record	1
Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, Costa Ricalocation not on record	1

3 institutions · 104 of 130 vouchered records shown · 26 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA7 detections

Where the DNA of Anurocampa mingens was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found7

Studies independent surveys1

Countries2

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 7 detections have coordinates

Open the map2 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median21.6 °C 21.2–25.9

Seasonal swing summer↔winter7.50 °C

Max temp (day)25.2 °C 24.7–28.0

Min temp (night)18.2 °C 17.9–23.9

Precipitation276 mm/mo 202–345

Air humidity72.1 % 68.6–72.4

Moisture balance154 mm/mo 75.6–225

Vapour deficit717 Pa 696–1,046

Wind speed1.80 m/s 1.50–1.90

Cloud cover42.8 % 30.2–49.4

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 7 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)