Antrodia albida is a species of fungus in the genus Antrodia that grows on the dead wood of deciduous trees. A widely distributed species, it is found in Africa, Asia, Europe, Oceania, North America, and South America. The fungus was first described under the name Daedalea albida by Elias Magnus Fries in his 1815 work Observationes mycologicae. Marinus Anton Donk transferred it to Antrodia in 1960.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Antrodia albida has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens3
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences9
eDNA detections4
Countries4
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS9
fungal barcode
07Deep time~16.1 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin16.1 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 306 records
Wild obs. + sensor753
Museum / vouchered553
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO3 792 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy35% within 1 km
≤100 m 137≤1 km 98≤10 km 395>10 km 34
664 georeferenced · 89 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor753
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy41% within 1 km
≤100 m 63≤1 km 64≤10 km 168>10 km 17
312 georeferenced · 241 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence553
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions31 of 54 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Bronx, US
89
GJOlocation not on record
50
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
38
Kew, GB
35
Chicago, US
19
Centro de Estudios Superiores del Estado de Sonoralocation not on record
19
Zürich, CH
18
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
17
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
16
Karlsruhe, DE
15
Mexico City, MX
11
Mlocation not on record
11
Copenhagen, DK
11
Odawara, JP
10
WU-MYClocation not on record
8
IPA/SPlocation not on record
8
San Sebastián, ES
7
Uppsala, SE
7
Toronto, CA
6
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)location not on record
6
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
5
Cincinnati, US
5
Schenectady, US
5
Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabascolocation not on record
5
LDlocation not on record
5
Görlitz, DE
4
Zapopan, MX
4
Beltsville, US
4
MAlocation not on record
4
Salamanca, ES
4
UJEDlocation not on record
4
Tartu, EE
3
TENN-Flocation not on record
3
Durango, MX
2
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
2
Vitoria, ES
2
Göteborg, SE
2
Slovenian Forestry Institutelocation not on record
2
Tomioka, JP
2
Chiba, JP
2
Osaka, JP
2
Brisbane, AU
2
DPIlocation not on record
2
MeiseBGlocation not on record
1
Baton Rouge, US
1
St. Paul, US
1
Bando, JP
1
Champaign, US
1
Kensington, AU
1
TFC Miclocation not on record
1
National Institute of Biological Resourceslocation not on record
1
BDBClocation not on record
1
Denver, US
1
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
1
54 institutions · 487 of 553 vouchered records shown · 65 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA4 detections
Where the DNA of Antrodia albida was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found4
Studies independent surveys2
Countries1
Verifiable raw sequence linked1
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 4 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median8.70 °C 8.70–8.70
Seasonal swing summer↔winter20.4 °C
Max temp (day)12.3 °C
Min temp (night)5.00 °C
Precipitation45.1 mm/mo
Air humidity62.8 %
Moisture balance-26.0 mm/mo
Vapour deficit487 Pa
Wind speed4.60 m/s
Cloud cover42.0 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.