Anthura gracilis is een pissebed uit de familie Anthuridae. De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1808 door Montagu.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anthura gracilis has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens9
BINs2
Marker genes1
eDNA detections4
Countries3
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P
animal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type4 286 records
Wild obs. + sensor657
Museum / vouchered3 159
Other470
Origin
Native5
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO2 840 km²
Depth
0–200 m sunlit1 492
200–1000 m twilight1
1–4 km midnight0
>4 km abyssal0
median 30 m · max 330 m · 1 493 records with depth
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy79% within 1 km
≤100 m 477≤1 km 10≤10 km 132
619 georeferenced · 38 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor657
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km
≤100 m 78≤1 km 8
86 georeferenced · 3 073 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence3 159
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions3 of 22 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
CEFASlocation not on record
1 155
Institut Francais pour l'Etude de la Merlocation not on record
32
Hellenic Centre of Marine Research; Institute for Oceanographylocation not on record
23
486location not on record
20
DASSHlocation not on record
20
730location not on record
4
University of Aveiro, Centre for Environmental and Marine Studieslocation not on record
3
Université de Liège Underwater research and oceanographic station (4501)location not on record
3
Brussels, BE
3
Eco laboratory geochemistry Benthic Environments UMR 8222 (4503) Université de Liège Underwater research and oceanographic station (4501)location not on record
3
CSIC-CEAB Centre for Advanced Studies of Blanes (1393) Eco laboratory geochemistry Benthic Environments UMR 8222 (4503)location not on record
2
CSIC-CEAB Centre for Advanced Studies of Blanes (1393) Eco laboratory geochemistry Benthic Environments UMR 8222 (4503) Université de Liège Underwater research and oceanographic station (4501)location not on record
2
RBINS-Scientific Heritagelocation not on record
2
PNHSlocation not on record
2
Eco laboratory geochemistry Benthic Environments UMR 8222 (4503)location not on record
1
CSIC-CEAB Centre for Advanced Studies of Blanes (1393) Eco laboratory geochemistry Benthic Environments UMR 8222 (4503) Phaxas Expertise Of Marine Fauna (4507) Université de Liège Underwater research and oceanographic station (4501)location not on record
1
Museum für Naturkunde Berlin (Zoological Collections)location not on record
1
Washington, US
1
CSIC-CEAB Centre for Advanced Studies of Blanes (1393) Phaxas Expertise Of Marine Fauna (4507)location not on record
1
CSIC-CEAB Centre for Advanced Studies of Blanes (1393)location not on record
1
Laboratoria di biologia marina di Triestelocation not on record
1
South Kensington, GB
1
22 institutions · 1 282 of 3 159 vouchered records shown
09Environmental DNA4 detections
Where the DNA of Anthura gracilis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found4
Studies independent surveys1
Countries3
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 4 detections have coordinates
Open the map3 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median18.8 °C 18.3–19.4
Seasonal swing summer↔winter6.70 °C
Max temp (day)20.2 °C 19.7–21.5
Min temp (night)17.3 °C 15.2–18.9
Precipitation46.0 mm/mo 35.2–80.3
Air humidity62.5 % 61.4–63.5
Vapour deficit822 Pa 771–871
Cloud cover35.1 % 30.9–38.2
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 4 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility2 040 records↗
OBISOcean Biodiversity Information System2 246 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI4 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics9 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗