Anthonomus bituberculatus

C.G.Thomson, 1868 · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Coleoptera/Curculionidae/Anthonomus

At a glance

Occurrence records585

Data sources4

Biological traits0

DNA specimens7

eDNA detections1

Sources4 archives

Databases and archives Anthonomus bituberculatus's data was compiled from.

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility585 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI1 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics7 specimens↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page3 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

Occurrence & distributionGBIF585 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 0 countries1 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD7 specimens

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding7 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anthonomus bituberculatus has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens7

BINs1

Marker genes2

eDNA detections1

Countries4

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-3P★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type585 records

Wild obs. + sensor490

Museum / vouchered87

Fossil5

Other3

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO1 188 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy79% within 1 km

≤100 m 229≤1 km 80≤10 km 78>10 km 2

389 georeferenced · 101 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor490

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy56% within 1 km

≤100 m 16≤1 km 24≤10 km 32

72 georeferenced · 15 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence87

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions4 of 21 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record	19
CBDClocation not on record	13
MNHWlocation not on record	9
Trondheim, NO	6
NTNU-VMlocation not on record	4
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record	4
Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record	4
Natural History Museum, Londonlocation not on record	3
BioFokuslocation not on record	2
South Kensington, GB	2
neflocation not on record	2
MZLUlocation not on record	2
Salzburg, AT	1
Uniwersytet Jagiellońskilocation not on record	1
Helsinki, FI	1
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiejlocation not on record	1
Olocation not on record	1
NHMOlocation not on record	1
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record	1
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record	1
NCMGlocation not on record	1

21 institutions · 79 of 87 vouchered records shown · 8 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA1 detections

Where the DNA of Anthonomus bituberculatus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found1

Studies independent surveys1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 1 detections have coordinates

Open the map0 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)