Anterhynchium flavomarginatum

(Smith, 1852) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Hymenoptera/Eumenidae/Anterhynchium

At a glance

Occurrence records344

Data sources6

Biological traits0

DNA specimens5

eDNA detections8

Sources6 archives

Databases and archives Anterhynchium flavomarginatum's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility344 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI8 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics5 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF344 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 2 countries8 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD5 specimens

01Narrative

黄缘蜾蠃又名黃緣前喙蜾蠃、黃斑前喙蜾蠃。是膜翅目胡蜂科蜾蠃亚科缘蜾蠃属的一种昆虫。广泛分布于中国、蒙古、韩国和日本等地。黄缘蜾蠃通常利用自然洞穴筑巢，尤其偏好选择被甲虫钻空的植物秸秆或草茎作为筑巢场所，亦有在人造竹棚的竹管內築巢之紀錄。

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding5 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anterhynchium flavomarginatum has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens5

BINs2

Marker genes2

eDNA detections8

Countries5

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P655 bp consensus4 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 89% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Diversity (π)6.2%

Haplotypes2

BINs2

Most divergent pair8.5%

Where individuals differ — all 70 variable positions, in barcode order

22Avariable

23Avariable

28Avariable

34Avariable

43Tvariable

67Amostly conserved

74Tmostly conserved

76Gvariable

82Cmostly conserved

91Amostly conserved

112Tmostly conserved

136Cvariable

157Cmostly conserved

202Cmostly conserved

214Tmostly conserved

217Tmostly conserved

220Cmostly conserved

235Cmostly conserved

263Cmostly conserved

265Amostly conserved

266Tmostly conserved

271Amostly conserved

274Tmostly conserved

287Tmostly conserved

310Avariable

325Tmostly conserved

340Tmostly conserved

343Tmostly conserved

346Cmostly conserved

347Tmostly conserved

358Cmostly conserved

364Amostly conserved

373Avariable

376Cmostly conserved

379Tmostly conserved

385Tmostly conserved

386Cmostly conserved

394Tmostly conserved

412Amostly conserved

418Cmostly conserved

425Amostly conserved

427Tmostly conserved

457Cvariable

467Cmostly conserved

469Tmostly conserved

481Tvariable

485Cvariable

496Tmostly conserved

500Tmostly conserved

517Tmostly conserved

518Cvariable

532Cvariable

542Cvariable

547Cmostly conserved

556Tmostly conserved

562Amostly conserved

565Tmostly conserved

571Tmostly conserved

589Cvariable

610Cmostly conserved

613Cvariable

616Cvariable

619Tmostly conserved

622Avariable

625Amostly conserved

631Tmostly conserved

634Tmostly conserved

646Tvariable

652Cvariable

653Tvariable

AATTTTATATTTTATTTTTGGAATATGATCAGGAATAATTGGTTCTGCTTTAAGAATAATTATTCGATTAGAATTGAGAACCCCAGGAAA …

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Symmorphus allobrogussame family13.1%Symmorphus cristatussame family13.6%Euodynerus crypticussame family13.7%Ancistrocerus scoticussame family14.0%Leptochilus regulussame family14.4%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P18S-5P

animal barcoderibosomal

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type344 records

Wild obs. + sensor189

Museum / vouchered155

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO808 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy72% within 1 km

≤100 m 57≤1 km 24≤10 km 9>10 km 23

113 georeferenced · 76 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor189

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤1 km 18

18 georeferenced · 137 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence155

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions5 of 10 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Ibaraki Universitylocation not on record	54
Kawasaki Shi Tama Ku, JP	42
Philadelphia, US	17
Sanda, JP	13
Bonn, DE	10
Chiba, JP	6
WIlocation not on record	3
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record	3
NSMKlocation not on record	3
KCMNlocation not on record	2

10 institutions · 153 of 155 vouchered records shown · 2 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA8 detections

Where the DNA of Anterhynchium flavomarginatum was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found8

Studies independent surveys1

Countries2

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 8 detections have coordinates

Open the map2 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median25.8 °C 24.4–27.2

Seasonal swing summer↔winter19.7 °C

Max temp (day)28.8 °C 27.6–29.9

Min temp (night)22.1 °C 20.4–23.8

Precipitation435 mm/mo 423–446

Air humidity67.8 % 66.8–68.9

Moisture balance308 mm/mo 294–322

Vapour deficit1,069 Pa 1,015–1,122

Wind speed1.70 m/s 1.60–1.70

Cloud cover39.7 % 33.2–46.3

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)